Breast cancer

Go to Quick Reference Guide

Optimal care pathways map seven key steps in cancer care. Each of these steps outlines nationally agreed best practice for the best level of care. While the seven steps appear in a linear model, in practice, patient care does not always occur in this way but depends on the particular situation (e.g. the type of cancer, when and how the cancer is diagnosed, prognosis, management, the patient’s decisions and their physiological response to treatment).

The principles underpinning optimal care pathways always put patients at the centre of care throughout their experience and prompt the healthcare system to deliver coordinated care.

The optimal care pathways do not constitute medical advice or replace clinical judgement, and they refer to clinical guidelines and other resources where appropriate.

The optimal care pathway

Evidence-based guidelines, where they exist, should inform timeframes. Treatment teams need to recognise that shorter timeframes for appropriate consultations and treatment often promote a better experience for patients. Three steps in the pathway specify timeframes for care. They are designed to help patients understand the timeframes in which they can expect to be assessed and treated, and to help health services plan care delivery in accordance with expert-informed time parameters to meet the expectation of patients. These timeframes are based on expert advice from the Breast Cancer Working Group, recognising that they may not always be possible.

Timeframes for care

Step in pathway

Care point

Timeframe

Presentation, initial investigations and referral

Signs and symptoms

A patient with signs and symptoms that may suggest breast cancer should be seen by a GP within 2 weeks

Initial investigations initiated by GP

Optimally, tests should be done within 2 weeks

Referral to specialist

A positive result on any component of the triple test warrants specialist surgical referral. Ideally the surgeon should see the patient with proven or suspected cancer within 2 weeks of diagnosis. If necessary, prior discussion should facilitate referral

Diagnosis, staging and treatment planning

Diagnosis and staging

Diagnostic investigations should be completed within 2 weeks of the initial specialist consultation

Multidisciplinary meeting and treatment planning

Ideally, the multidisciplinary team should discuss all newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer prior to surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Results of all relevant tests and imaging

should be available for the MDM

Referral to a breast cancer nurse within 7 days of definitive diagnosis

Treatment

Surgery

Surgery should occur ideally within 5 weeks of the decision to treat (for invasive breast cancer)

Chemotherapy and Systemic therapy

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy should begin within 4 weeks of the decision to treat

Adjuvant chemotherapy should begin within 6 weeks of surgery

Adjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast and HER2-positive breast cancer should begin within 4 weeks of surgery

Endocrine therapy should begin as soon as appropriate after completing chemotherapy, radiation therapy and/or surgery (and in some cases will be started in the neoadjuvant setting)

Radiation therapy

For patients who don’t have adjuvant chemotherapy, radiation therapy should begin within 8 weeks of surgery

For patients who have adjuvant chemotherapy, radiation therapy should begin 3–4 weeks after chemotherapy

Seven steps of the optimal care pathway

Step 1: Prevention and early detection

Step 2: Presentation, initial investigations and referral of patients with suspected breast cancer

Step 3: Diagnosis, staging and treatment planning

Step 4: Treatment

Step 5: Care after initial treatment and recovery

Step 6: Managing recurrent, residual or metastatic disease

Step 7: End-of-life care

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in Australian women, accounting for more than 29 per cent of newly diagnosed cancers. It is second only to lung cancer as the most common cause of death from cancer (AIHW 2019).

Breast cancer in men accounts for less than 1 per cent of all breast cancers, with 90 per cent of men diagnosed with breast cancer after the age of 50 (Cancer Australia 2016). The recommendations in this document apply to all patients unless otherwise specified.

Early breast cancer may or may not have spread to lymph nodes in the armpit. Advanced breast cancer comprises both locally advanced breast and metastatic breast cancer (Cardoso et al. 2018). Locally advanced breast cancer is breast cancer with extensive axillary nodal involvement and that may have spread to areas near the breast, such as the chest wall.

This step outlines recommendations for the prevention and early detection of breast cancer.

Evidence shows that not smoking, avoiding or limiting alcohol intake, eating a healthy diet, maintaining a healthy body weight, being physically active, being sun smart and avoiding exposure to oncoviruses or carcinogens may help reduce most cancer risk (Cancer Council Australia 2018).

These are the convincing risk factors for developing breast cancer (Cancer Australia 2018) (those highlighted in bold are modifiable):

  • age
  • gender (being female)
  • significant family history of breast cancer and/or other cancers
  • pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes including BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, PALB2, PTEN, NF1, STK11, TP53, ATM and CHEK2
  • DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ)
  • LCIS (lobular carcinoma in situ) also referred to as non-invasive lobular neoplasia
  • atypical epithelial proliferative lesions (atypical ductal hyperplasia and atypical lobular hyperplasia)
  • previous breast cancer
  • high mammographic breast density (must be adjusted for age and body mass index)
  • early menarche
  • not bearing children
  • never having breastfed
  • late age at first birth
  • late menopause
  • maternal exposure to diethylstilboestrol (DES) in utero
  • use of combined hormone replacement therapy, particularly for extended periods over many years
  • not engaging in adequate physically active
  • overweight and obesity (only for postmenopausal women)
  • weight gain (postmenopausal)
  • alcohol consumption
  • exposure of the breast to ionising radiation.

For more information, visit the Cancer Australia breast cancer risk factor website.

Recommendations that may assist in preventing breast cancer include:

  • maintaining a healthy weight
  • avoiding or limiting alcohol intake to no more than 10 standard drinks a week and no more than four standard drinks on any one day
  • getting 30 minutes or more of moderate-intensity (puffing) exercise most days (150–300 minutes per week)
  • avoiding or limiting hormone replacement therapy use
  • additional prevention strategies in people with increased risk (e.g. gene mutation carriers).

Additional prevention interventions are considered for women at increased risk, including those at moderately increased risk. For example, those at moderately increased risk (1.5–3 times the population risk) may be offered medication to reduce risk, and those at high risk (more than three times the population risk) may be offered medication or risk-reducing surgery.

Everyone should be encouraged to reduce their modifiable risk factors (see section 1.1).

For women assessed as having an increased risk of breast cancer, antihormonal risk-reducing medication such as tamoxifen, raloxifene or an aromatase inhibitor is an option to lower the risk of developing breast cancer. Decisions about whether to use risk-reducing medication should be based on an accurate risk assessment and clear understanding of the absolute benefits and risks for each individual woman. The benefits and risks for an individual can be assessed by using iPrevent.

Risk-reducing surgery such as prophylactic bilateral mastectomy may be considered by women at high risk of developing breast cancer (NCI 2015), including those with a mutation in a major breast cancer predisposition gene such as BRCA1 or BRCA2 (Cancer Council Australia 2015).

Bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy reduces the absolute risk of breast cancer by at least 90 per cent (NCI 2015). Even with total mastectomy, not all breast tissue can be removed. The remaining breast tissue may be at risk of becoming cancerous in the future (NCI 2013).

Knowledge of a woman’s risk factors can be used to objectively assess her individual breast cancer risk using a validated tool such as iPrevent.

By accurately assessing a woman’s personal breast cancer risk level, health professionals can offer the most appropriate evidence-based prevention and early detection strategies. All women should therefore consider having their individual breast cancer risk assessed. This can be done by women themselves or in primary care. Cancer risk assessment should be repeated when major risk factors change (e.g. new family cancer history, breast biopsy showing atypical hyperplasia or LCIS).

There are a number of validated computerised breast cancer risk assessment tools that estimate a woman’s breast cancer risk based on her individual risk factors:

iPrevent is an Australian tool designed for self-administration by women and collaborative use with clinicians and is the only tool that links the risk assessment directly to the relevant risk management guidelines.

In Australia, absolute lifetime population risk of breast cancer is 12 per cent, but most women are below this risk. Cancer Australia defines levels of breast cancer risk as follows:

  • average risk: < 1.5 × population risk
  • moderate risk: 1.5–3 × population risk
  • high risk: > 3 × population risk (Cancer Australia 2010).

People with or without a personal history of breast cancer at high risk due to their family cancer history should be referred to a familial cancer service for further risk assessment and for possible genetic testing (eviQ 2019a). Consider referring:

  • untested adult blood relatives of a person with a known pathogenic variant (mutation) in a breast and/or ovarian cancer predisposition gene (e.g. BRCA1 or BRCA2, TP53, PTEN, STK11, PALB2, CDH1, NF1) or
  • people with two first- or second-degree relatives diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer plus one or more of the following on the same side of the family:
  • additional relative(s) with breast or ovarian cancer
  • breast cancer diagnosed under age 50 years
  • more than one primary breast cancer in the same woman
  • breast and ovarian cancer in the same woman
  • Jewish ancestry
  • breast cancer in a male
  • pancreatic cancer
  • high-grade (≥ Gleason 7) prostate cancer.

Additionally, people with breast cancer should be referred to a familial cancer service if they meet the following criteria:

  • male breast cancer at any age
  • breast cancer and Jewish ancestry
  • two primary breast cancers in the same person, where the first occurred under age 60 years
  • two or more different but associated cancers in the same person at any age (e.g. breast and ovarian cancer)
  • breast cancer aged under 40 years or triple-negative breast cancer aged under 50 years
  • lobular breast cancer and a family history of lobular breast or diffuse-type gastric cancer
  • breast cancer aged under 50 years with limited family structure or knowledge (e.g. adopted)
  • breast cancer and a personal or family history suggestive of:
  • Peutz-Jegher syndrome (oral pigmentation and/or gastrointestinal polyposis)
  • PTEN hamartoma syndrome (macrocephaly, specific mucocutaneous lesions, endometrial or thyroid cancer)
  • Li-Fraumeni syndrome (breast cancer < 50 years, adrenocorticocarcinoma, sarcoma, brain tumours).

Referral can also be considered if finding a relevant germline mutation would have high clinical utility (e.g. would alter treatment of the current cancer).

Asymptomatic women

A significant proportion of breast cancers are diagnosed through mammographic screening in women who are asymptomatic. Assess a woman’s individualised risk to see whether a personalised screening regimen may be appropriate.

Early detection through screening mammography has several benefits including improved mortality rates, increased treatment options and improved quality of life (Cancer Australia 2015a). For women with small tumours at diagnosis (< 10 mm), there is a more than 95 per cent five-year survival rate (Cancer Australia 2012).

BreastScreen Australia services operate within the framework of a comprehensive set of national accreditation standards that specify requirements for the safety and quality of diagnostic tests, timeliness of services and multidisciplinary care.

State, territory and federally funded two-yearly mammographic screening is offered to asymptomatic women from the age of 50 to 74 years through the BreastScreen Australia program (although available after 40 years of age upon request).

A doctor’s referral is not required for screening through BreastScreen Australia, but general practitioners’ encouragement is a key factor in women’s participation in screening.

Not all breast cancers are detectable on screening mammograms, and new cancers may arise in the interval between mammograms. Women should be aware of the look and feel of their breasts and report concerns to their general practitioner.

Women invited to screening should be provided with information about the risk and benefits of mammographic screening.

There is a 42 per cent reduction in risk of dying from breast cancer in screened women (AIHW 2018b) and a significant reduction in treatment intensity for patients diagnosed within a screening program.

Screening can lead to anxiety, additional investigations for non-malignant processes, over-diagnosis and treatment of cancers that may never have needed treatment. Over-diagnosis could occur due to lesions that may not progress to invasive cancer during the woman’s lifetime. Some lesions that need investigation based on their imaging features turn out not to be cancer. Providing women with information on risks and benefits can assist them to make informed decisions around screening participation (Cancer Australia 2014).

For more information, see Cancer Australia’s position statement on over-diagnosis.

If a woman is reported as having high mammographic density please refer to the IBIS risk tool.

Symptomatic people

People who have symptoms or signs of breast cancer require prompt investigation of their symptoms, including diagnostic imaging. Screening mammography is not recommended for these people because it may lead to false reassurance and delayed diagnosis.

This step outlines the process for the general practitioner to initiate the right investigations and refer to the appropriate specialist in a timely manner. The types of investigations the general practitioner undertakes will depend on many factors, including access to diagnostic tests, the availability of medical specialists and patient preferences.

At least one-third of breast cancers are found in apparently asymptomatic women through routine breast cancer screening, and participation in BreastScreen Australia should be encouraged for eligible women. The remaining women have symptomatic presentations.

The following signs and symptoms should be investigated:

  • a persistent new lump or lumpiness, especially involving only one breast
  • a change in the size or shape of a breast
  • a change to a nipple, such as crusting, ulceration, redness or inversion
  • a nipple discharge that occurs without manual expression
  • a change in the skin of a breast such as redness, thickening or dimpling
  • axillary mass(es)
  • an unusual breast pain that does not go away (Cancer Australia 2020b; Walker et al 2014).

People with symptoms as described above should not attend BreastScreen because they will require diagnostic imaging either publicly or privately.

A patient with signs and symptoms that may suggest breast cancer should be seen by a general practitioner within two weeks.

The types of investigation undertaken by a general practitioner depend on many factors including access to diagnostic tests and medical specialists and the patient’s preferences. General practitioners should refer all patients with a suspicious sign or symptom to a breast assessment clinic.

General practitioner examinations and investigations should include a triple test of three diagnostic components:

  • medical history and clinical breast examination
  • imaging – mammography and/or ultrasound
  • non-excision biopsy – preferably core biopsy (Cancer Australia 2017a; Farshid et al. 2019). Pathologists should expedite such testing as part of routine clinical care. Funding through the Medicare Benefits Schedule is accessible for receptor profile evaluation of screen-detected cancers, including immunohistochemistry for ER, PR and HER2 and, when necessary, in situ hybridisation to assess HER2 gene amplification.

Fine-needle aspiration biopsy does not permit distinction between invasive cancer and in situ malignancy. Evaluation of grade and subtype are not reliable, and cytology is inappropriate for assessing a cancer’s receptor profile (ER, PR, HER2), critical for optimal treatment planning, including suitability of neoadjuvant therapy. Fine-needle aspiration cytology may be considered if the clinical and imaging features suggest a benign process, particularly a cystic lesion. If cytology results are non-diagnostic, atypical, suspicious or malignant, core biopsy is needed.

Based on the best available evidence, the triple test provides the most effective means of excluding breast cancer in patients with breast symptoms. A positive result on any component of the triple test warrants referral for specialist surgical assessment and/or further investigation, irrespective of any other normal test results. This implies that not all three components of the triple test need to be performed to reach the conclusion that appropriate referral is needed. The triple test is positive if any component is indeterminate, suspicious or malignant (Cancer Australia 2017a).

For screen-detected lesions, a 2020 review by Cancer Australia established that core biopsy (including vacuum-assisted core biopsy) is the procedure of choice for assessing most screen-detected breast abnormalities (Cancer Australia 2020c). Fine-needle aspiration in the screening setting is appropriate for simple cysts, some complex cystic lesions, axillary lymph nodes and rare situations where a core biopsy is hazardous or technically difficult.

BreastScreen Australia services take responsibility for screening and investigation of screen-detected lesions, including needle biopsies. After multidisciplinary assessment and review of results, recommendations are made for the next steps in management. The woman and her general practitioner are advised of these recommendations in writing. Surgery and ongoing care are typically not part of the BreastScreen program and must be coordinated by the general practitioner through appropriate surgical referral.

To enable timely treatment planning, including consideration of neoadjuvant therapies, it is preferable that the histologic findings, including the receptor profile results, be available in time for the patient’s first consultation with the treating surgeon. Information could be provided to patients to enable them to make an informed decision on neoadjuvant therapy. See Breast Cancer Trials ‘Neoadjuvant patient decision aid’ brochure.

Any patient with symptoms suspicious of breast cancer can be referred for specialist assessment as first line. If the diagnosis of breast malignancy is confirmed or the results are inconsistent or indeterminate, referral to a BreastSurgANZ member breast surgeon is warranted. See BreastSurgANZ ‘Find a surgeon’ for a directory.

Patients should be enabled to make informed decisions about their choice of specialist and health service. General practitioners should make referrals in consultation with the patient after considering the clinical care needed, cost implications (see referral options and informed financial consent), waiting periods, location and facilities, including discussing the patient’s preference for health care through the public or the private system.

Referral for suspected or diagnosed breast cancer should include the following essential information to accurately triage and categorise the level of clinical urgency:

  • important psychosocial history and relevant medical history
  • family history, current symptoms, medications and allergies
  • results of current clinical investigations (imaging and pathology reports with ER, PR and HER2 receptor profile)
  • results of all prior relevant investigations
  • notification if an interpreter service is required.

Many services will reject incomplete referrals, so it is important that referrals comply with all relevant health service criteria.

If access is via online referral, a lack of a hard copy should not delay referral.

The specialist should provide timely communication to the general practitioner about the consultation and should notify the general practitioner if the patient does not attend appointments.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients will need a culturally appropriate referral. To view the optimal care pathway for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and the corresponding quick reference guide, visit the Cancer Australia website. Download the consumer resources Checking for cancer and Cancer from the Cancer Australia website.

A positive result on any component of the triple test warrants specialist surgical referral. Ideally, the surgeon should see the patient with proven or suspected cancer within two weeks of diagnosis. If necessary, prior discussion should facilitate referral.

The patient’s general practitioner should consider an individualised supportive care assessment where appropriate to identify the needs of an individual, their carer and family. Refer to appropriate support services as required. See validated screening tools mentioned in Principle 4 ‘Supportive care’.

A number of specific needs may arise for patients at this time:

  • assistance for dealing with the emotional distress and/or anger of dealing with a potential cancer diagnosis, anxiety/depression, interpersonal problems and adjustment difficulties
  • access to expert health professionals with specific knowledge about the psychosocial needs of breast cancer patients
  • encouragement and support to increase levels of exercise (Cormie et al. 2018; Hayes et al. 2019).

For more information refer to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 2015 guidelines, Suspected cancer: recognition and referral.

For additional information on supportive care and needs that may arise for different population groups, see Appendices A and B, and special population groups.

The general practitioner is responsible for:

  • providing patients with information that clearly describes to whom they are being referred, the reason for referral and the expected timeframes for appointments
  • outlining their potential role and that of the primary care team throughout treatment and follow-up care (Cancer Australia 2020d)
  • considering referral to a breast care nurse such as a McGrath breast care nurse or a nurse in a local breast cancer centre
  • considering referral to Breast Cancer Network Australia’s ‘My Journey online tool’ and local community-based support such as peer support
  • requesting that patients notify them if the specialist has not been in contact within the expected timeframe
  • considering referral options for patients living rurally or remotely

supporting the patient while waiting for the specialist appointment (Cancer Council nurses are available to act as a point of information and reassurance during the anxious period of awaiting further diagnostic information; patients can contact 13 11 20 nationally to speak to a cancer nurse).

More information

Refer to Principle 6 ‘Communication’ for communication skills training programs and resources.

Step 3 outlines the process for confirming the diagnosis and stage of cancer and for planning subsequent treatment. The guiding principle is that interaction between appropriate multidisciplinary team members should determine the treatment plan.

The treatment team, after taking a medical history and making a medical examination of the patient, should undertake the following investigations under the guidance of a specialist:

  • appropriate breast imaging tests including bilateral mammography and ultrasound (if conventional imaging is insufficient to help guide treatment, consider MRI)
  • ultrasound of the axilla (including fine-needle aspiration of nodes if the axillary ultrasound is abnormal)
  • breast core biopsy, if not already undertaken (which allows determination of breast cancer receptor profiles [ER, PR, HER2]).

Patients should be assessed for the possibility of a breast cancer predisposition gene and considered for genetic counselling/testing if appropriate. For more information refer to eviQ’s Referral guidelines for breast cancer risk assessment and consideration of genetic testing.

Diagnostic investigations should be completed within two weeks of the initial specialist consultation.

People with breast cancer should be referred for genetic work-up early in their treatment journey if they fulfil germline testing criteria using CanRisk or the Manchester score, or have a triple-negative breast cancer under 50 years of age. Other factors pertaining to genetic work-up include a personal or family history suggestive of:

  • Peutz-Jegher syndrome (oral pigmentation and/or gastrointestinal polyposis)
  • PTEN hamartoma syndrome (macrocephaly, specific mucocutaneous lesions, endometrial or thyroid cancer)
  • Li-Fraumeni syndrome (breast cancer < 50 years, adrenocorticocarcinoma, sarcoma, brain tumours).

Family history-based testing threshold can be assessed using the Manchester score APP.

In some cases certain pathological subtypes of cancer or tumour tests (immunohistochemistry or tumour genetic tests) may suggest an underlying inherited cancer predisposition, especially triple-negative breast cancers.

Genetic testing is sometimes able to identify the cause of cancer in a family and may be used to guide treatment for the affected people.

A familial cancer service assessment can determine if genetic testing is appropriate. Genetic testing is likely to be offered when there is at least a 10 per cent chance of finding a causative ‘gene error’ (pathogenic gene variant; previously called a mutation). Usually testing begins with a variant search in a person who has had cancer (a diagnostic genetic test). If a pathogenic gene variant is identified, variant-specific testing is available to relatives to see if they have or have not inherited the familial gene variant (predictive genetic testing).

Medicare funds some genetic tests via a Medicare Benefits Schedule item number. Depending on the personal and family history, the relevant state health system may fund public sector genetic testing.

Pre-test counselling and informed consent is required before any genetic testing. In some states the treating team can offer ‘mainstream’ diagnostic genetic testing, after which referral is made to a familial cancer service if a pathogenic gene variant is identified. The familial cancer service can provide risk management advice, facilitate family risk notification and arrange predictive genetic testing for the family.

Visit the Centre for Genetics Education website for basic information about cancer in a family.

For detailed information and referral guidelines for breast cancer risk assessment and consideration of genetic testing, read eviQ’s Referral guidelines for breast cancer risk assessment and consideration of genetic testing.

Routine staging with, for example, computed tomography (CT) and bone scan are not recommended for most patients with early breast cancer. For a patient presenting with de novo metastatic disease, see Step 6.

Staging is appropriate for patients with confirmed locally advanced or nodal disease and for any patient with clinical symptoms or clinical suspicion of metastatic disease. PET scan may be the most appropriate modality.

More information

Visit the Cancer Institute New South Wales website for information about understanding the stages of cancer.

Patient performance status is a central factor in cancer care and should be clearly documented in the patient’s medical record.

Performance status should be measured and recorded using an established scale such as the Karnofsky scale or the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale.

People over the age of 70 years should undergo some form of geriatric assessment (COSA 2013; palliAGED 2018). Screening tools can be used to identify those patients in need of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (Decoster et al. 2015). This assessment can be used to help determine life expectancy and treatment tolerance and guide appropriate referral for multidisciplinary intervention that may improve outcomes (Wildiers et al. 2014).

A number of factors should be considered at this stage:

  • the patient’s overall condition, life expectancy, decision-making capacity and results from a geriatric assessment if appropriate in those over the age of 70 years
  • patient preferences and aims of treatment
  • psychosocial screening/evaluation and support
  • discussing the multidisciplinary team approach to care with the patient
  • ensuring a breast care nurse is part of the multidisciplinary team
  • appropriate and timely referral to an MDM
  • considering if an interpreter is required
  • pregnancy and fertility options, contraception and prevention of chemotherapy-induced menopause
  • financial and social aspects
  • support with travel and accommodation
  • teleconferencing or videoconferencing as required.

Discussion at an MDM is a core component of quality care (ASCO & ESMO 2006). All patients with a new diagnosis of breast cancer should be referred to an MDM for discussion. Ideally, the multidisciplinary team should discuss all newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer prior to surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Results of all relevant tests and imaging should be available for the MDM. To assist with the burden of demand, sites may streamline and prioritise the MDM discussion using agreed protocols. Patients should be offered a referral to a breast cancer nurse within seven days of a definitive diagnosis.

Patients may be discussed at several time points during their diagnosis and treatment. This can ensure patients are identified who may benefit from neoadjuvant systemic therapy, where surgical decisions are complex and in planning of reconstructive surgery and sequencing of therapies, or for relevant clinical trials.

The multidisciplinary team requires administrative support in developing the agenda for the meeting, for collating patient information and to ensure appropriate expertise around the table to create an effective treatment plan for the patient. The MDM has a chair and multiple lead clinicians. Each patient case will be presented by a lead clinician (usually someone who has seen the patient before the MDM). In public hospital settings, the registrar or clinical fellow may take this role. A member of the team records the outcomes of the discussion and treatment plan in the patient history and ensures these details are communicated to the patient’s general practitioner.

When developing treatment recommendations for each patient, MDM participants ensure:

  • the tumour has been adequately staged
  • all appropriate treatment modalities are considered
  • psychosocial and medical comorbidities that may influence treatment decisions are considered
  • the patient’s treatment preferences are known and considered
  • clinical trial eligibility, availability and participation are considered
  • relevant optimal care pathway timeframes are considered.

The team should consider the patient’s values, beliefs and cultural needs as appropriate to ensure the treatment plan is in line with these. There may be early consideration of post-treatment pathways at this point – for example, shared follow-up care.

MDMs should aim to develop and agree by consensus an individualised treatment plan for each patient discussed. At times when there is a divergence of opinion about a patient’s management or equivalent options, these differing opinions should be discussed with the patient to enable them to make an informed decision. Patients should be given time to discuss treatment options with others before making this decision.

MDM recommendations should be communicated in a timely manner to the patient and referring doctor/general practitioner with formal documentation. Further details regarding MDM requirements can be found via the Victorian cancer multidisciplinary team meeting quality framework.

The multidisciplinary team should be composed of the core disciplines that are integral to providing good care. Team membership should reflect both clinical and supportive care aspects of care. Pathology and radiology expertise are essential.

See ‘About this OCP’ for a list of team members who may be included in the multidisciplinary team for breast cancer.

Core members of the multidisciplinary team are expected to attend most MDMs either in person or remotely via virtual mechanisms. Additional expertise or specialist services may be required for some patients such as breast cancer patients during pregnancy. An Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural expert should be considered for all patients who identify as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander.

The general practitioner who made the referral is responsible for the patient until care is passed to another practitioner who is directly involved in planning the patient’s care.

The general practitioner may play a number of roles in all stages of the cancer pathway including diagnosis, referral, treatment, shared follow-up care, post-treatment surveillance, coordination and continuity of care, as well as managing existing health issues and providing information and support to the patient, their family and carer.

A nominated contact person from the multidisciplinary team may be assigned responsibility for coordinating care in this phase. Care coordinators (usually a breast care nurse) are responsible for ensuring there is continuity throughout the care process and coordination of all necessary care for a particular phase (COSA 2015). The care coordinator may change over the course of the pathway.

The lead clinician is responsible for overseeing the activity of the team and for implementing treatment within the multidisciplinary setting.

Patients should be encouraged to participate in research or clinical trials where available and appropriate.

For more information visit:

Cancer prehabilitation uses a multidisciplinary approach combining exercise, nutrition and psychological strategies to prepare patients for the challenges of cancer treatment such as surgery, systemic therapy and radiation therapy. Team members may include anaesthetists, oncologists, surgeons, haematologists, clinical psychologists, exercise physiologists, physiotherapists and dietitians, among others.

Patient performance status is a central factor in cancer care and should be frequently assessed. All patients should be screened for malnutrition using a validated tool, such as the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST). The lead clinician may refer obese or malnourished patients to a dietitian preoperatively or before other treatments begin.

Patients who currently smoke should be encouraged to stop smoking before receiving treatment. This should include an offer of referral to Quitline in addition to smoking cessation pharmacotherapy if clinically appropriate.

Evidence indicates that patients who respond well to prehabilitation may have fewer complications after treatment. For example, those who were exercising before diagnosis and patients who use prehabilitation before starting treatment may improve their physical or psychological outcomes, or both, and this helps patients to function at a higher level throughout their cancer treatment (Cormie et al. 2017; Silver 2015).

A key contact person, ideally a breast care nurse, should be agreed as soon as possible (within seven days is optimal) to support communication and coordination of patient-centred care. Consultations may be via telephone and/or videoconferencing, where appropriate (Cancer Australia 2020e).

For patients with breast cancer, the multidisciplinary team should consider these specific prehabilitation assessments and interventions for treatment-related complications or major side effects:

  • conducting a physical and psychological assessment to establish a baseline function level
  • identifying impairments and providing targeted interventions to improve the patient’s function level (Silver & Baima 2013)
  • reviewing the patient’s medication to ensure optimisation and to improve adherence to medicine used for comorbid conditions. Some medications, such as anticoagulants, may need to be modified before surgery.

Following completion of primary cancer treatment, rehabilitation programs have considerable potential to enhance physical function.

See Breast Cancer Network Australia’s ‘Physical Preparation & Recovery After Breast Reconstruction’.

Cancer and cancer treatment may cause fertility problems. This will depend on the age of the patient, the type of cancer and the treatment received. Infertility can range from difficulty having a child to the inability to have a child. Infertility after treatment may be temporary, lasting months to years, or permanent (AYA Cancer Fertility Preservation Guidance Working Group 2014).

Patients need to be advised about and potentially referred for discussion about fertility preservation before starting treatment and need advice about contraception before, during and after treatment. Patients and their family should be aware of the ongoing costs involved in optimising fertility. Fertility management may apply in both men and women. Fertility preservation options are different for men and women and the need for ongoing contraception applies to both men and women.

The potential for impaired fertility should be discussed and reinforced at different time points as appropriate throughout the diagnosis, treatment, surveillance and survivorship phases of care. These ongoing discussions will enable the patient and, if applicable, the family to make informed decisions. All discussions should be documented in the patient’s medical record.

More information

See the Cancer Council website for more information.

See Breast Cancer Network Australia’s fertility video for more information.

See validated screening tools mentioned in Principle 4 ‘Supportive care’.

A number of specific challenges and needs may arise for patients at this time:

  • assistance for dealing with psychological and emotional distress while adjusting to the diagnosis; treatment phobias; existential concerns; stress; difficulties making treatment decisions; anxiety or depression or both; psychosexual issues such as potential loss of fertility and premature menopause; history of sexual abuse; and interpersonal problems
  • access to expert health professionals with specific knowledge about the psychosocial needs of breast cancer patients
  • for some populations (culturally diverse backgrounds, Aboriginal people and lesbian, transgender and intersex communities) a breast cancer diagnosis comes with additional psychosocial complexities, and discrimination uncertainty may also make these groups less inclined to seek regular medical care – access to expert health professionals with specific knowledge about the psychosocial needs of these groups may be required
  • preservation of ovarian function should be discussed before starting treatment – goserelin reduces the risk of chemotherapy-induced menopause and should particularly be discussed before chemotherapy for women with ER-negative breast cancer (for some women with ER-positive breast cancer it may also be appropriate to use goserelin before and during chemotherapy; see Breast Cancer Network Australia’s Fertility-related choices booklet
  • management of physical symptoms such as pain and fatigue (Australian Adult Cancer Pain Management Guideline Working Party 2019)
  • upper limb and breast lymphoedema and cording following lymphadenectomy – this is a potential treatment side effect in people with breast cancer, which has a significant effect on survivor quality of life; referral (preferably preoperatively) to a health professional with accredited lymphoedema management qualifications, offering the full scope of complex lymphoedema therapy, should be encouraged
  • limitations in upper limb movement and function, which may affect radiation therapy – referral to a physiotherapist may be required (prospective monitoring, particularly for high-risk patients is recommended)
  • weight changes, which can be a significant issue for patients, and may require referral to a dietitian before, during and after treatment
  • malnutrition or undernutrition, identified using a validated nutrition screening tool such as the MST (note that many patients with a high body mass index [obese patients] may also be malnourished [WHO 2018])
  • support for families or carers who are distressed with the patient’s cancer diagnosis
  • support for families/relatives who may be distressed after learning of a genetically linked cancer diagnosis
  • specific spiritual needs that may benefit from the involvement of pastoral/spiritual care
  • financial and employment issues (such as loss of income and having to deal with travel and accommodation requirements for rural patients and caring arrangements for other family members).

Additionally, palliative care may be required at this stage.

For more information on supportive care and needs that may arise for different population groups, see Appendices A and B, and special population groups.

In discussion with the patient, the lead clinician should undertake the following:

  • establish if the patient has a regular or preferred general practitioner and if the patient does not have one, then encourage them to find one
  • provide written information appropriate to the health literacy of the patient about the diagnosis and treatment to the patient and carer and refer the patient to the Guide to best cancer care (consumer optimal care pathway) for breast cancer, as well as to relevant websites and support groups as appropriate
  • refer the patient to Breast Cancer Network Australia’s ‘My Journey online tool
  • discuss the importance of relatives accessing predictive genetic testing when a pathogenic variant is identified in the patient
  • provide a treatment care plan including contact details for the treating team and information on when to call the hospital
  • discuss a timeframe for diagnosis and treatment with the patient and carer
  • discuss the benefits of multidisciplinary care and gain the patient’s consent before presenting their case at an MDM
  • provide brief advice and refer to Quitline (13 7848) for behavioural intervention if the patient currently smokes (or has recently quit), and prescribe smoking cessation pharmacotherapy, if clinically appropriate
  • recommend an ‘integrated approach’ throughout treatment regarding nutrition, exercise and minimal or no alcohol consumption among other considerations
  • communicate the benefits of continued engagement with primary care during treatment for managing comorbid disease, health promotion, care coordination and holistic care
  • where appropriate, review fertility needs with the patient and refer for specialist fertility management (including fertility preservation, contraception, management during pregnancy and of future pregnancies)
  • be open to and encourage discussion about the diagnosis, prognosis (if the patient wishes to know) and survivorship and palliative care while clarifying the patient’s preferences and needs, personal and cultural beliefs and expectations, and their ability to comprehend the communication
  • encourage the patient to participate in advance care planning including considering appointing one or more substitute decision-makers and completing an advance care directive to clearly document their treatment preferences. Each state and territory has different terminology and legislation surrounding advance care directives and substitute decision-makers.

Consider appointing one lead clinician at the time of initial diagnosis; however, all treating clinicians have these communication responsibilities:

  • involving the general practitioner from the point of diagnosis
  • ensuring regular and timely communication with the general practitioner about the diagnosis, treatment plan and recommendations from MDMs and inviting them to participate in MDMs (consider using virtual mechanisms)
  • gathering information from the general practitioner including their perspective on the patient’s psychosocial issues and comorbidities and locally available support services
  • supporting the role of general practice both during and after treatment
  • discussing shared or team care arrangements with general practitioners or regional cancer specialists, or both, together with the patient
  • contributing to the development of a chronic disease and mental health care plan as required, particularly to access community supportive care service
  • notifying the general practitioner if the patient does not attend appointments.
More information

Refer to Principle 6 ‘Communication’ for communication skills training programs and resources.

Step 4 describes the optimal treatments for breast cancer, the training and experience required of the treating clinicians and the health service characteristics required for optimal cancer care.

All health services must have clinical governance systems that meet the following integral requirements:

  • identifying safety and quality measures
  • monitoring and reporting on performance and outcomes
  • identifying areas for improvement in safety and quality (ACSQHC 2020).

Step 4 outlines the treatment options for breast cancer. For detailed clinical information on treatment options refer to this resource:

The intent of treatment can be defined as one of the following:

  • curative
  • anti-cancer therapy to improve quality of life and/or longevity without expectation of cure
  • symptom palliation.

The treatment intent should be established in a multidisciplinary setting, documented in the patient’s medical record and conveyed to the patient and carer as appropriate.

The potential benefits need to be balanced against the morbidity and risks of treatment.

The appropriate clinician should discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each treatment and associated potential side effects with the patient and their carer or family before treatment consent is obtained and begins so the patient can make an informed decision. Supportive care services should also be considered during this decision-making process. Patients should be asked about their use of (current or intended) complementary/alternative therapies (see Appendix D).

Timeframes for starting treatment should be informed by evidence-based guidelines where they exist. The treatment team should recognise that shorter timeframes for appropriate consultations and treatment often promote a better experience for patients.

Initiate advance care planning discussions with patients before treatment begins (this could include appointing a substitute decision-maker and completing an advance care directive). Formally involving a palliative care team/service may benefit any patient, so it is important to know and respect each person’s preference (AHMAC 2011).

The aim of treatment for breast cancer and the types of treatment recommended depend on the type, stage and location of the cancer and the patient’s age, health and preferences.

Early and locally advanced breast cancer is treated with curative intent.

Surgery for early breast cancer involves either breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy. Breast conserving surgery followed by radiation therapy is as effective as mastectomy for most patients with early breast cancer.

Patients with invasive breast cancer and a clinically and radiologically negative axilla should generally be offered sentinel node biopsy. Axillary treatment with surgery and/or radiation therapy should be considered for patients with nodal disease.

Oncoplastic breast surgery should be considered where appropriate to ensure the patient has the best possible outcome. Surgery may involve the breast surgeon and plastic surgeon working together because some reconstructions are very complex. It is important that patients are given enough time to consider their reconstructive options. This may require more than one appointment with the treating surgeon. It is the responsibility of the multidisciplinary team to ensure the patient is referred in a timely manner to allow for adequate planning of the surgery.

Breast reconstruction surgery

Mastectomy can be performed with or without immediate breast reconstruction. Patients should be fully informed of their options and offered the option of immediate or delayed reconstructive surgery if appropriate.

Timeframe for starting treatment

  • Surgery should occur ideally within five weeks of the decision to treat (for invasive breast cancer).
  • If being treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery is deferred until four to six weeks after the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, ensuring blood counts have recovered.

Training and experience required of the surgeon

  • Breast surgeon (FRACS or equivalent, including membership of BreastSurgANZ) with adequate training and experience in breast cancer surgery and institutional agreed scope of practice within this area
  • Plastic surgeon with an interest and expertise in breast reconstructive surgery and who contributes to the Australia Breast Device Registry

Documented evidence of the surgeon’s training and experience, including their specific (sub-specialty) experience with breast cancer and procedures to be undertaken, should be available.

Health service characteristics

To provide safe and quality care for patients having surgery, health services should have access to:

  • appropriate nursing and theatre resources to manage complex surgery
  • a breast care nurse
  • a multidisciplinary team
  • critical care support
  • 24-hour medical staff availability
  • 24-hour operating room access and intensive care unit
  • specialist pathology expertise
  • diagnostic imaging
  • in-house access to specialist radiology and nuclear medicine expertise.

If appropriate, goserelin for preventing chemo-induced menopause should begin at least one week prior to chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant therapy, usually chemotherapy, may be appropriate for an increasing number of breast cancers, which may include tumours where the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy may direct future therapy (e.g. triple-negative and HER2-positive cancers, locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancers as well as some larger operable breast cancers to down-stage tumours), either to make them operable or to allow breast-conserving therapy. The receptor profile of the breast cancer (ER, PR, HER2) assessed by pathologists on the core biopsy is essential in making decisions about the appropriateness and nature of neoadjuvant therapies.

For early breast cancers following surgery, a further discussion at the MDM will determine the appropriateness and type of systemic therapy. All patients with invasive cancer should be considered for systemic therapy.

Patients with LCIS and atypical hyperplasia should be considered for endocrine therapy (tamoxifen or anastrozole) to reduce future invasive breast cancer risk.

All patients with HER2-positive breast cancers (> 5 mm) should be considered for HER2-directed therapy. All patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer should be considered for antihormonal therapy. Endocrine therapy should be administered for five years and sometimes longer in higher risk cases.

A core biopsy is the recommended sample for evaluating receptor profile in breast cancer. The information about receptor profile should be made available to the treating teams including the pathologist evaluating the cancer resection specimen. This information helps to identify cases of discordance where further assessment is required and to reduce unnecessary repeat testing.

For patients who have not had a complete pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy, repeat assessment of receptor profile on the resected breast cancer tissue is required to plan ongoing treatment.

Adjuvant bisphosphonates improve survival and should be considered for selected patients being treated for breast cancer with curative intent.

Timeframes for starting treatment

  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy should begin within four weeks of the decision to treat with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy should begin within six weeks of surgery.
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast and HER2-positive breast cancer should begin within four weeks of surgery.
  • Endocrine therapy should begin as soon as appropriate after completing chemotherapy, radiation therapy and/or surgery (and in some cases will begin in the neoadjuvant setting).

Training and experience required of the appropriate specialists

Medical oncologists must have training and experience of this standard:

  • Fellow of the Royal Australian College of Physicians or Medical Oncology Group of Australia (or equivalent)
  • adequate training and experience that enables institutional credentialing and agreed scope of practice within this area (ACSQHC 2015).

Cancer (chemotherapy) nurses should have accredited training in these areas:

  • anti-cancer treatment administration
  • specialised nursing care for patients undergoing cancer treatments, including side effects and symptom management
  • the handling and disposal of cytotoxic waste (ACSQHC 2020).

Systemic therapy should be prepared by a pharmacist whose background includes this experience:

  • adequate training in systemic therapy medication, including dosing calculations according to protocols, formulations and/or preparation.

In a setting where no medical oncologist is locally available (e.g. regional or remote areas), some components of less complex therapies may be delivered by a general practitioner or nurse with training and experience that enables credentialing and agreed scope of practice within this area. This should be in accordance with a detailed treatment plan or agreed protocol, and with communication as agreed with the medical oncologist or as clinically required.

The training and experience of the appropriate specialist should be documented.

Health service characteristics

To provide safe and quality care for patients having systemic therapy, health services should have these features:

  • a clearly defined path to emergency care and advice after hours
  • access to diagnostic pathology including basic haematology and biochemistry, and imaging
  • cytotoxic drugs prepared in a pharmacy with appropriate facilities
  • occupational health and safety guidelines regarding handling of cytotoxic drugs, including preparation, waste procedures and spill kits (eviQ 2019b)
  • guidelines and protocols to deliver treatment safely (including dealing with extravasation of drugs)
  • coordination for combined therapy with radiation therapy, especially where facilities are not co-located
  • appropriate molecular pathology access.

Radiation therapy is used to treat early, locally advanced, recurrent and metastatic breast cancer in conjunction with surgery and/or systemic treatments, depending on patient and disease factors.

In most cases, radiation therapy is recommended for patients with early breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery.

Hypofractionated radiation therapy (a three- to four-week course) should be considered for most patients with early breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving therapy.

Radiation therapy following mastectomy should be considered for selected patients.

Partial breast irradiation (including intraoperative radiation therapy or linac-based) can be considered for selected patients with early breast cancer.

Discussion at an MDM is essential.

Timeframe for starting treatment

  • For patients who do not have adjuvant chemotherapy, radiation therapy should begin within eight weeks of surgery.
  • For patients who have adjuvant chemotherapy, radiation therapy should begin three to four weeks after chemotherapy.

Training and experience required of the appropriate specialists

Radiation oncologist (FRANZCR or equivalent) with adequate training and experience that enables institutional credentialing and agreed scope of practice within this area.

The training and experience of the radiation oncologist should be documented.

Health service unit characteristics

To provide safe and quality care for patients having radiation therapy, health services should have these features:

  • linear accelerator (LINAC) capable of image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT)
  • dedicated CT planning
  • access to MRI and PET imaging
  • automatic record-verify of all radiation treatments delivered
  • a treatment planning system
  • trained medical physicists, radiation therapists and nurses with radiation therapy experience
  • coordination for combined therapy with systemic therapy, especially where facilities are not co-located
  • participation in Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service audits
  • an incident management system linked with a quality management system.

The team should support the patient to participate in research or clinical trials where available and appropriate. Many emerging treatments are only available on clinical trials that may require referral to certain trial centres.

For more information visit:

See validated screening tools mentioned in Principle 4 ‘Supportive care’.

Assess the patient’s response to all treatments using clinical outcome measures and patient-reported measures.

A number of specific challenges and needs may arise for patients at this time:

  • assistance for dealing with emotional and psychological issues, including body image concerns, fatigue, quitting smoking, traumatic experiences, existential anxiety, treatment phobias, anxiety/depression, interpersonal problems and sexuality concerns
  • access to expert health professionals with specific knowledge about the psychosocial needs of breast cancer patients
  • potential isolation from normal support networks, particularly for rural patients who are staying away from home for treatment
  • alteration of cognitive functioning in patients treated with chemotherapy and radiation therapy, which requires strategies such as maintaining written notes or a diary and repetition of information
  • loss of fertility, sexual dysfunction or other symptoms associated with treatment or surgically or chemically induced menopause, which requires sensitive discussion and possible referral to a clinician skilled in this area
  • general healthcare issues (e.g. smoking cessation and sleep disturbance), which can be referred to a general practitioner
  • decline in mobility or functional status as a result of treatment
  • management of physical symptoms such as pain, arthralgia and fatigue
  • early management for acute pain postoperatively to avoid chronic pain
  • side effects of chemotherapy such as neuropathy, cardiac dysfunction, nausea and vomiting; managing these side effects is important for improving quality of life
  • managing complex medication regimens, multiple medications, assessment of side effects and assistance with difficulties swallowing medications – referral to a pharmacist may be required
  • menopause symptoms, which may require referral to a menopause clinic
  • upper limb problems following surgery including decreased range of movement, which may delay radiation therapy – referral to a physiotherapist may be required
  • upper limb and breast lymphoedema following lymphadenectomy/radiation therapy – this is a potential treatment side effect in patients with breast cancer that has a significant effect on survivor quality of life; referral (preferably preoperatively) to a health professional with accredited lymphoedema management qualifications, offering the full scope of complex lymphoedema therapy, should be encouraged (prospective monitoring, particularly for high-risk patients is recommended)
  • disfigurement and scarring from appearance-altering treatment (and possible need for a prosthetic), which may require referral to a specialist psychologist, psychiatrist or social worker
  • weight changes – this may require referral to a dietitian before, during and after treatment
  • bowel dysfunction, gastrointestinal or abdominal symptoms as a result of treatment, which may require support from a dietitian
  • coping with hair loss and changes in physical appearance (refer to the Look Good, Feel Better program; see ’Resource List’ and/or consider scalp cooling)
  • assistance with beginning or resuming regular exercise with referral to an exercise physiologist or physiotherapist (COSA 2018; Hayes et al. 2019).

Early involvement of general practitioners may lead to improved cancer survivorship care following acute treatment. General practitioners can address many supportive care needs through good communication and clear guidance from the specialist team (Emery 2014).

Patients, carers and families may have these additional issues and needs:

  • financial issues related to loss of income (through reduced capacity to work or loss of work) and additional expenses as a result of illness or treatment
  • advance care planning, which may involve appointing a substitute decision-maker and completing an advance care directive
  • legal issues (completing a will, care of dependent children) or making an insurance, superannuation or social security claim on the basis of terminal illness or permanent disability.

Cancer Council’s 13 11 20 information and support line can assist with information and referral to local support services.

Breast Cancer Network Australia’s helpline (1800 500 258) and website can assist with information and support services.

For more information on supportive care and needs that may arise for different population groups, see A and B, and special population groups.

Rehabilitation may be required at any point of the care pathway. If it is required before treatment, it is referred to as prehabilitation (see section 3.6.1).

All members of the multidisciplinary team have an important role in promoting rehabilitation. Team members may include occupational therapists, speech pathologists, dietitians, social workers, psychologists, physiotherapists, exercise physiologists and rehabilitation specialists.

To maximise the safety and therapeutic effect of exercise for people with cancer, all team members should recommend that people with cancer work towards achieving, and then maintaining, recommended levels of exercise and physical activity as per relevant guidelines. Exercise should be prescribed and delivered under the direction of an accredited exercise physiologist or physiotherapist with experience in cancer care (Vardy et al. 2019). The focus of intervention from these health professionals is tailoring evidence-based exercise recommendations to the individual patient’s needs and abilities, with a focus on the patient transitioning to ongoing self-managed exercise.

Other issues that may need to be dealt with include managing cancer-related fatigue, improving physical endurance, achieving independence in daily tasks, optimising nutritional intake, returning to work and ongoing adjustment to cancer and its sequels. Referrals to dietitians, psychosocial support, return-to-work programs and community support organisations can help in managing these issues.

The lead or nominated clinician should take responsibility for these important aspects of treatment:

  • discussing treatment options with patients and carers, including the treatment intent and expected outcomes, and providing a written version of the plan and any referrals
  • providing patients and carers with information about the possible side effects of treatment, managing symptoms between active treatments, how to access care, self-management strategies and emergency contacts
  • encouraging patients to use question prompt lists and audio recordings, and to have a support person present to aid informed decision making
  • offering advice to patients and carers on the benefits of and how to access support
  • initiating a discussion about advance care planning and involving carers or family if the patient wishes.

The general practitioner plays an important role in coordinating care for patients, including helping to manage side effects and other comorbidities, and offering support when patients have questions or worries. For most patients, simultaneous care provided by their general practitioner is very important.

The lead clinician, in discussion with the patient’s general practitioner, should consider these points:

  • the general practitioner’s role in symptom management, supportive care and referral to local services
  • using a chronic disease management plan and mental health care management plan
  • how to ensure regular and timely two-way communication about:
    • the treatment plan, including intent and potential side effects
    • supportive and palliative care requirements
    • the patient’s prognosis and their understanding of this
    • enrolment in research or clinical trials
    • changes in treatment or medications
    • the presence of an advance care directive or appointment of a substitute decision-maker
    • recommendations from the multidisciplinary team.
More information

Refer to Principle 6 ‘Communication’ for communication skills training programs and resources.

The term ‘cancer survivor’ describes a person living with cancer, from the point of diagnosis until the end of life. Survivorship care in Australia has traditionally been provided to patients who have completed active treatment and are in the post-treatment phase. But there is now a shift to provide survivorship care and services from the point of diagnosis to improve cancer-related outcomes.

Cancer survivors may experience inferior quality of life and cancer-related symptoms for up to five years after their diagnosis (Jefford et al. 2017). Distress, fear of cancer recurrence, fatigue, obesity and sedentary lifestyle are common symptoms reported by cancer survivors (Vardy et al. 2019).

Due to an ageing population and improvements in treatments and supportive care, the number of people surviving cancer is increasing. International research shows there is an important need to focus on helping cancer survivors cope with life beyond their acute treatment. Cancer survivors often face issues that are different from those experienced during active treatment for cancer and may include a range of issues, as well as unmet needs that affect their quality of life (Lisy et al. 2019; Tan et al. 2019).

Physical, emotional and psychological issues include fear of cancer recurrence, cancer-related fatigue, pain, distress, anxiety, depression, cognitive changes and sleep issues (Lisy et al. 2019). Late effects may occur months or years later and depend on the type of cancer treatment. Survivors and their carers may experience impacted relationships and practical issues including difficulties with return to work or study and financial hardship. They may also experience changes to sex and intimacy. Fertility, contraception and pregnancy care after treatment may require specialist input.

The Institute of Medicine, in its report From cancer patient to cancer survivor: Lost in transition, describes the essential components of survivorship care listed in the paragraph above, including interventions and surveillance mechanisms to manage the issues a cancer survivor may face (Hewitt et al. 2006). Access to a range of health professions may be required including physiotherapy, occupational therapy, social work, dietetics, clinical psychology, fertility and palliative care. Coordinating care between all providers is essential to ensure the patient’s needs are met.

Cancer survivors are more likely than the general population to have and/or develop comorbidities (Vijayvergia & Denlinger 2015). Health professionals should support survivors to self-manage their own health needs and to make informed decisions about lifestyle behaviours that promote wellness and improve their quality of life (Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre 2016; Cancer Australia 2017b; NCSI 2015).

Breast Cancer Network Australia provides information and support designed specifically for the transition to life after treatment.

The transition from active treatment to post-treatment care is critical to long-term health. In some cases, people will need ongoing, hospital-based care, and in other cases a shared follow-up care arrangement with their general practitioner may be appropriate. This will vary depending on the type and stage of cancer and needs to be planned.

Shared follow-up care involves the joint participation of specialists and general practitioners in the planned delivery of follow-up and survivorship care. A shared care plan is developed that outlines the responsibilities of members of the care team, the follow-up schedule, triggers for review, plans for rapid access into each setting and agreement regarding format, frequency and triggers for communication.

Shared follow-up care for early breast cancer is an innovative model of care that supports holistic follow-up and survivorship care following active treatment (Cancer Australia 2019c).

After completing initial treatment, a designated member of the multidisciplinary team (most commonly nursing or medical staff involved in the patient’s care) should provide the patient with a needs assessment and treatment summary and develop a survivorship care plan in conjunction with the patient. This should include a comprehensive list of issues identified by all members of the multidisciplinary team involved in the patient’s care and by the patient. These documents are key resources for the patient and their healthcare providers and can be used to improve communication and care coordination.

The treatment summary should cover, but is not limited to:

  • the diagnostic tests performed and results
  • diagnosis including stage, prognostic or severity score
  • tumour characteristics
  • treatment received (types and dates)
  • current toxicities (severity, management and expected outcomes)
  • interventions and treatment plans from other health providers
  • potential long-term and late effects of treatment
  • supportive care services provided
  • follow-up schedule
  • contact information for key healthcare providers.

Responsibility for follow-up care should be agreed between the lead clinician, the general practitioner, relevant members of the multidisciplinary team and the patient. This is based on guideline recommendations for post-treatment care, as well as the patient’s current and anticipated physical and emotional needs and preferences.

The options for follow-up should encompass the following:

  • A follow-up schedule will be planned based on the patient’s individual circumstances.
  • Investigations should be determined on a case-by-case basis.
  • Most follow-up will involve a history, including updating personal history and enquiry about persistent symptoms that might require investigation to exclude metastatic disease. Family cancer history should be updated.
  • If the patient has previously had genetic testing that revealed an unclassified variant in a cancer predisposition gene, the clinician should liaise regularly with the relevant familial cancer service until the variant is classified as benign or pathogenic.
  • In the case of a pathogenic variant, the clinician should prompt predictive testing in close blood relatives and recommend referral to a familial cancer service.
  • Physical examination, and particularly breast examination and limb circumference measure, should be conducted. Annual mammography (unless the patient underwent a bilateral mastectomy) should be undertaken. In some cases it may be appropriate to also undertake breast ultrasound or MRI.
  • Appropriate follow-up does not involve chest x-rays, bone scans, CT scans, positron emission tomography (PET) scans or blood tests unless the cancer has spread or there are symptoms suggesting metastases.
  • Toxicity related to treatment should be monitored and managed, including bone health
  • and cardiovascular health (Blaes & Konety 2020). There is a significant role for physiotherapy in preventing osteoporosis.
  • Premenopausal women who develop amenorrhoea are at risk of rapid bone loss. There is evidence that oral bisphosphonates are effective in reducing bone loss.
  • Continue to prompt general good health.

Adherence to ongoing recommended treatment such as endocrine therapy should be reviewed and side effects managed proactively to optimise adherence.

Evidence comparing shared follow-up care and hospital-based care indicates equivalence in outcomes including recurrence rate, cancer survival and quality of life (Cancer Research in Primary Care 2016).

Ongoing communication between healthcare providers involved in care and a clear understanding of roles and responsibilities is key to effective survivorship care.

In particular circumstances, other models of post-treatment care can be safely and effectively provided such as nurse-led models of care (Monterosso et al. 2019). Other models of post-treatment care can be provided in these locations or by these health professionals:

  • in a shared care setting
  • in a general practice setting
  • by non-medical staff
  • by allied health or nurses
  • in a non-face-to-face setting (e.g. by telehealth).

A designated member of the team should document the agreed survivorship care plan. The survivorship care plan should support wellness and have a strong emphasis on healthy lifestyle changes such as a balanced diet, a non-sedentary lifestyle, weight management and a mix of aerobic and resistance exercise (COSA 2018; Hayes et al. 2019).

This survivorship care plan should also cover, but is not limited to:

  • what medical follow-up is required (surveillance for recurrence or secondary and metachronous cancers, screening and assessment for medical and psychosocial effects)
  • model of post-treatment care, the health professional providing care and where it will be delivered
  • care plans from other health providers to manage the consequences of cancer and cancer treatment
  • wellbeing, primary and secondary prevention health recommendations that align with chronic disease management principles
  • rehabilitation recommendations
  • available support services
  • a process for rapid re-entry to specialist medical services for suspected recurrence.

Survivors generally need regular follow-up, often for five or more years after cancer treatment finishes. The survivorship care plan therefore may need to be updated to reflect changes in the patient’s clinical and psychosocial status and needs.

Processes for rapid re-entry to hospital care should be documented and communicated to the patient and relevant stakeholders.

Care in the post-treatment phase is driven by predicted risks (e.g. the risk of recurrence, developing late effects of treatment and psychological issues) as well as individual clinical and supportive care needs. It is important that post-treatment care is based on evidence and is consistent with guidelines. Not all people will require ongoing tests or clinical review and may be discharged to general practice follow-up.

The lead clinician should discuss (and general practitioner reinforce) options for follow-up at the start and end of treatment. It is critical for optimal aftercare that the designated member of the treatment team educates the patient about the symptoms of recurrence.

General practitioners (including nurses) can:

  • connect patients to local community services and programs
  • manage long-term and late effects
  • manage comorbidities
  • provide wellbeing information and advice to promote self-management
  • screen for cancer and non-cancerous conditions.
More information

Templates and other resources to help with developing treatment summaries and survivorship care plans are available from these organisations:

  • Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre
  • Cancer Australia – Principles of Cancer Survivorship
  • Cancer Australia – Shared cancer follow-up and survivorship care: early breast cancer
  • Cancer Council Australia and states and territories
  • Clinical Oncology Society of Australia – Model of Survivorship Care
  • eviQ – Cancer survivorship: introductory course
  • MyCarePlan.org.au
  • South Australian Cancer Service – Statewide Survivorship Framework resources
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology – guidelines.

Not smoking, eating a healthy diet, being sun smart, avoiding or limiting alcohol intake, being physically active and maintaining a healthy body weight may help reduce the risk of primary recurrence or a second primary cancer.

Encourage and support all cancer survivors to reduce modifiable risk factors for recurrence as well as other chronic diseases. Ongoing coordination of care between providers should also deal with any comorbidities, particularly ongoing complex and life-threatening comorbid conditions.

Support cancer survivors to participate in research or clinical trials where they are available and appropriate. These might include studies to understand survivors’ issues, to better manage treatment side effects, or to improve models of care and quality of life.

For more information visit:

See validated screening tools mentioned in Principle 4 ‘Supportive care’. Additionally, the ‘Cancer Survivors Unmet Needs (CaSun)’ is another validated screening tool that may help health professionals to identify the unmet needs of patients during survivorship.

A number of specific challenges and needs may arise for cancer survivors, which may require support:

  • access to expert health professionals with specific knowledge about the psychosocial needs of breast cancer patients
  • family distress if familial cancer pathogenic variant is identified
  • weight changes, which may be a significant issue for patients and may require referral to a dietitian
  • menopause symptoms, which may require referral to a menopause clinic
  • general healthcare issues (e.g. smoking cessation and sleep disturbance), which can be referred to a general practitioner
  • management of physical symptoms such as pain, arthralgia and fatigue
  • decline in mobility and/or functional status as a result of treatment, which may necessitate a referral to physiotherapy or occupational therapy
  • upper limb and breast lymphoedema following lymphadenectomy/radiation therapy, which is a potential treatment side effect in patients with breast cancer that has a significant effect on survivor quality of life – referral to a health professional with accredited lymphoedema management qualifications, offering the full scope of complex lymphoedema therapy, may be needed
  • bowel dysfunction, gastrointestinal or abdominal symptoms as a result of treatment, which may require support from a dietitian
  • neuropathy, cardiac dysfunction, nausea and vomiting (managing these issues is important for improving quality of life)
  • coping with hair loss (refer to the Look Good, Feel Better program; see ’Resource List’ and/or consider scalp cooling)
  • managing complex medication regimens, multiple medications, assessment of side effects and assistance with difficulties swallowing medications, which may require referral to a pharmacist
  • financial and employment issues (such as loss of income and assistance with returning to work, and the cost of treatment, travel and accommodation)
  • appointing a substitute decision-maker and completing an advance care directive
  • legal issues such as completing a will.

For more information on supportive care and needs that may arise for different population groups, see Appendices A and B, and special population groups.

Rehabilitation may be required at any point of the care pathway from the pre-treatment phase through to disease-free survival and palliative care (Cormie et al. 2017).

Issues that may need to be dealt with include managing cancer-related fatigue, coping with cognitive changes, improving physical endurance, achieving independence in daily tasks, returning to study or work and ongoing adjustment to cancer and its sequels.

Exercise is a safe and effective intervention that improves the physical and emotional health and wellbeing of cancer patients. Exercise should be embedded as part of standard practice in cancer care and be viewed as an adjunct therapy that helps counteract the adverse effects of cancer and its treatment.

Cancer survivors may find referral to specific cancer rehabilitation, optimisation programs or community-based rehabilitation appropriate and beneficial. Other options include referral to allied health supports through team care arrangements and mental health plans. Some community support organisations (cancer-related non-government, not-for-profit and charities) provide services to cancer survivors.

The lead clinician (themselves or by delegation) should take responsibility for these tasks:

  • explaining the model of post-treatment care and the roles of health professionals involved in post-treatment care including the role of general practice
  • explaining the treatment summary and follow-up care plan
  • discussing the development of a shared follow-up and survivorship care plan where a model of shared follow-up care has been agreed
  • discussing how to manage any of the physical, psychological or emotional issues identified
  • providing information on the signs and symptoms of recurrent disease
  • providing a survivorship care plan with information on secondary prevention and healthy living
  • providing contact details of the care team involved
  • providing clear information about the role and benefits of palliative care and advance care planning
  • how to re-access specialist care if needed.

The lead clinician should ensure regular, timely, two-way communication with the general practitioner about:

  • the patient’s progress
  • the follow-up and survivorship care plan
  • potential late effects
  • supportive and palliative care requirements
  • any shared care arrangements
  • clarification of various roles in patient care
  • a process for rapid re-entry to medical services for patients with suspected recurrence or if there are other concerns.
More information

Refer to Principle 6 ‘Communication’ for communication skills training programs and resources.

Patients who present with recurrent or metastatic disease should be managed by a multidisciplinary team and offered timely referral to appropriate physical, practical and emotional support.

Step 6 is concerned with managing recurrent or local residual and metastatic disease. The likelihood of recurrence depends on many factors usually related to the type of cancer, the stage of cancer at presentation and the effectiveness of treatment. Some cancers cannot be eradicated even with the best initial treatment. But controlling disease and disease-related symptoms is often possible, depending on the clinical situation.

For detailed information on treatment options for advanced breast cancer refer to the 5th ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 5).

Consider the possibility of metastatic breast cancer if the patient has a symptom that persists over several weeks, tending to get worse rather than better and is otherwise unexplained.

Some cases of metastatic disease will be detected at the same time as presentation with the initial primary breast cancer (‘de novo metastatic disease’).

Signs and symptoms will depend on the type of cancer initially diagnosed and the location of metastatic disease. They may be discovered by the patient or by surveillance in the post-treatment period. Symptoms can often present as bone pain (most common), shortness of breath or cough, weight loss, abdominal symptoms or jaundice.

Other patients may present with symptoms of recurrent disease after a previous cancer diagnosis. Patients can present with symptoms of recurrent disease in the locoregional area, or at distant sites, or both. This may include a breast mass, skin nodules, enlarged lymph nodes or inflammatory cancer symptoms. Some local recurrence is detected at follow-up imaging only.

Some cases of recurrent disease will be detected by routine follow-up in a patient who is asymptomatic.

All cases should undergo investigation (staging scans) to establish the extent of disease and be rebiopsied if possible; biopsies should have receptor status re-evaluated.

Access to the best available therapies, including clinical trials, as well as treatment overseen by a multidisciplinary team, are crucial to achieving the best outcomes for anyone with metastatic or recurrent disease.

Managing recurrent or metastatic disease is complex and should therefore involve all the appropriate specialties in a multidisciplinary team including palliative care where appropriate.

A rebiopsy of accessible sites and re-evaluation of breast cancer receptor profile should be undertaken. Non-bony sites are preferred because processing of bone specimens hinders evaluation of HER2 status.

A complete assessment of the sites of disease including CT of the abdomen and pelvis and of the chest plus bone scans, or PET-CT and blood tumour markers should also be undertaken. Brain CT or MRI may be required. Assessment of organ function and comorbidities are necessary.

From the time of diagnosis, the team should offer patients appropriate psychosocial care, supportive care, advance care planning and symptom-related interventions as part of their routine care. The approach should be personalised to meet the patient’s individual needs, values and preferences. The full complement of supportive care measures as described throughout the optimal care pathway and in Appendices A and B, and in the special population groups section should be offered to assist patients and their families and carers to cope. These measures should be updated as the patient’s circumstances change.

Survivorship care should be considered and offered at an early stage. Many people live with advanced cancer for many months or years. As survival is improving in many patients, survivorship issues should be considered as part of routine care. Health professionals should therefore be ready to change and adapt treatment strategies according to disease status, prior treatment tolerance and toxicities and the patient’s quality of life, in addition to the patient’s priorities and life plans.

If there is an indication that a patient’s cancer has returned, care should be provided under the guidance of a treating specialist. Each patient should be evaluated to determine if referral to the original multidisciplinary team is necessary. Often referral back to the original multidisciplinary team will not be necessary unless there are obvious aspects of care involving different therapeutic and supportive care disciplines not otherwise accessible. The multidisciplinary team may include new members such as palliative care specialists and metastatic breast cancer nurses. If a metastatic breast cancer nurse is not available, then a resident breast cancer nurse who cares for early and metastatic breast cancer patients may be included.

Treatment will depend on the location, extent of recurrent disease, previous management and the patient’s preferences and may include all modalities of therapies (surgery, radiation therapy and systemic therapy). Antiresorptive therapy may be warranted if bone metastases are present.

In most cases, a combination of anti-cancer and supportive therapies will provide the most effective overall management of recurrent disease.

Regular assessment of the patient’s response to therapy should be undertaken and the therapy changed if disease progresses or as appropriate.

In patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer without rapidly progressing visceral disease, endocrine therapy combined with a CD4/6 inhibitor may be the most appropriate treatment initially with use of chemotherapy when endocrine responsiveness is lost.

Many endocrine therapies are effective in producing anti-tumour responses in metastatic breast cancer. These can often be used in sequence to gain successive responses to treatment. They include:

  • ovarian ablation/suppression in premenopausal women
  • selective oestrogen receptor modulators such as tamoxifen
  • aromatase inhibitors, which block oestrogen production
  • pure antioestrogen fulvestrant.

Treatment may focus on disease control or palliation based on the extent of disease, general health or the patient’s preferences and values.

The potential goals of treatment should be discussed, respecting the patient’s cultural values. Wherever possible, written information should be provided.

Encourage early referral to clinical trials or accepting an invitation to participate in research.

Advance care planning is important for all patients with a cancer diagnosis but especially those with advanced disease. Patients should be encouraged to think and talk about their healthcare values and preferences with family or carers, appoint a substitute decision-maker and consider developing an advance care directive to convey their preferences for future health care in the event they become unable to communicate their wishes (AHMAC 2011).

More information

Refer to section 6.6 ‘More information’ for links to resources.

Refer patients and carers to http://www.advancecareplanning.org.au or to the Advance Care Planning National Phone Advisory Service on 1300 208 582.

Early referral to palliative care can improve the quality of life for people with cancer and in some cases may be associated with survival benefits (Haines 2011; Temel et al. 2010; Zimmermann et al. 2014). The treatment team should emphasise the value of palliative care in improving symptom management and quality of life to patients and their carers.

The lead clinician should ensure timely and appropriate referral to palliative care services. Referral to palliative care services should be based on the patient’s need and potential for benefit, not prognosis.

Pain management intervention may be required. Palliative care services would preferably have access to interventional radiologists and pain services to assist with patients whose pain does not respond to conventional medications.

The ‘Dying to Talk’ resource may help health professionals when initiating discussions with patients about future care needs (see ‘More information’). Ensure that carers and families receive information, support and guidance about their role in palliative care (Palliative Care Australia 2018).

The patient, with support from their family or carer and treating team, should be encouraged to consider appointing a substitute decision-maker and to complete an advance care directive.

More information

These online resources are useful:

The treatment team should support the patient to participate in research and clinical trials where available and appropriate.

For patients with metastatic breast cancer, participation in clinical trials should be revisited by the multidisciplinary team due to alterations in the patient’s disease such as resistance to current treatment or new trials available.

For more information visit the Cancer Australia website.

See validated screening tools mentioned in Principle 4 ‘Supportive care’.

A number of specific challenges and needs may arise at this time for patients:

  • assistance for dealing with emotional and psychological distress resulting from fear of death or dying, existential concerns, anticipatory grief, communicating wishes to loved ones, interpersonal problems and sexuality concerns
  • access to expert health professionals with specific knowledge about the psychosocial needs of breast cancer patients
  • potential isolation from normal support networks, particularly for rural patients who are staying away from home for treatment
  • cognitive changes as a result of treatment and disease progression such as altered memory, attention and concentration (a patient may appoint someone to make medical, financial and legal decisions on their behalf – a substitute decision-maker – before and in case they experience cognitive decline)
  • decline in mobility or functional status as a result of recurrent disease and treatments (referral to physiotherapy or occupational therapy may be required)
  • coping with hair loss and changes in physical appearance (refer to the Look Good, Feel Better program; see ’Resource List’)
  • appointing a substitute decision-maker and completing an advance care directive
  • financial issues as a result of disease recurrence such as gaining early access to superannuation and insurance
  • legal issues (completing a will, care of dependent children) and making an insurance, superannuation or social security claim on the basis of terminal illness or permanent disability.

Rehabilitation may be required at any point of the metastatic care pathway, from preparing for treatment through to palliative care. Issues that may need to be dealt with include managing cancer-related fatigue, improving physical endurance, achieving independence in daily tasks, returning to work and ongoing adjustment to cancer and its sequels.

Exercise is a safe and effective intervention that improves the physical and emotional health and wellbeing of cancer patients. Exercise should be embedded as part of standard practice in cancer care and be viewed as an adjunct therapy that helps counteract the adverse effects of cancer and its treatment.

The lead clinician should ensure there is adequate discussion with patients and carers about the diagnosis and recommended treatment, including treatment intent and possible outcomes, likely adverse effects and the supportive care options available.

More information

Refer to Principle 6 ‘Communication’ for communication skills training programs and resources.

Step 7 is concerned with maintaining the patient’s quality of life and meeting their health and supportive care needs as they approach the end of life, as well as the needs of their family and carers.

Most patients with advanced cancer will reach a time when anti-cancer treatment is no longer appropriate. The team needs to share the principles of a palliative approach to care when making decisions with the patient and their family or carer. End-of-life care is appropriate when the patient’s symptoms are increasing and functional status is declining.

Honest communication with patients is essential to ensure they have time to prepare and appropriate support is in place for their family and carers.

If the treatment team does not include a palliative care member, the lead clinician should consider referring the patient to palliative care services, with the general practitioner’s engagement. This may include inpatient palliative unit access (as required).

The multidisciplinary team may consider seeking additional expertise from these professionals:

  • clinical psychologist
  • clinical nurse specialist or practitioner
  • social worker
  • palliative medicine specialist
  • pain specialist
  • pastoral or spiritual carer
  • bereavement counsellor
  • music therapist
  • art therapist
  • cultural expert
  • Canteen for children of parents with cancer

The team might also recommend that patients access these services:

  • home and community-based care
  • specialist community palliative care workers
  • community nursing.

If the patient does not already have an advance care directive in place, a designated member of the treatment team should encourage them to develop one in collaboration with their family or carer (AHMAC 2011).

It is essential for the treatment team to consider the appropriate place of care, the patient’s preferred place of death and the support needed for the patient, their family and carers.

The treatment team should also ensure that carers and families receive the information, support and guidance about their role according to their needs and wishes (Palliative Care Australia 2018).

More information

The treatment team can refer patients and carers to these resources:

Clinical trials may help improve palliative care and in managing a patient’s symptoms of advanced cancer (Cancer Council Victoria 2019). The treatment team should support the patient to participate in research and clinical trials where available and appropriate.

For more information visit the Cancer Australia website. See ’Resource list’ for additional clinical trial databases.

See validated screening tools mentioned in Principle 4 ‘Supportive care’.

A number of specific challenges and needs may arise for patients at this time:

  • assistance for dealing with emotional and psychological distress from anticipatory grief, fear of death or dying, anxiety/depression and interpersonal problems
  • access to expert health professionals with specific knowledge about the psychosocial needs of patients
  • management of physical symptoms including pain and fatigue
  • decline in mobility or functional status, affecting the patient’s discharge destination (a referral to physiotherapy, exercise physiology, occupational therapy or social work may be needed)
  • specific support for families where a parent is dying and will leave behind bereaved children or adolescents, creating special family needs
  • appointing a substitute decision-maker and completing an advance care directive
  • legal issues (completing a will, care of dependent children) and making an insurance, superannuation or social security claim on the basis of terminal illness or permanent disability
  • arranging a funeral.

These services and resources can help:

  • referral to 13 11 20 for Cancer Council Australia’s Pro Bono Program for free legal, financial, small business accounting and workplace assistance (subject to a means test)
  • Sad news sorry business (Queensland Health 2015) for the specific needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

For more information on supportive care and needs that may arise for different population groups, see Appendices A and B, and special population groups.

The lead clinician is responsible for:

  • being open to and encouraging discussion with the patient about the expected disease course, considering the patient’s personal and cultural beliefs and expectations
  • discussing palliative care options, including inpatient and community-based services as well as dying at home and subsequent arrangements
  • providing the patient and carer with the contact details of a palliative care service
  • referring the patient to palliative care in the community according to the carer’s wishes.

The lead clinician should discuss end-of-life care planning to ensure the patient’s needs and goals are met in the appropriate environment. The patient’s general practitioner should be kept fully informed and involved in major developments in the patient’s illness path.

More information

For support with communication skills and training programs, see these sources:

The burden of cancer is not evenly spread across Australia. People experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, culturally diverse communities, people living with a disability, people with chronic mental health or psychiatric concerns and those who live in regional and rural areas of Australia have poorer cancer outcomes.

Cancer is the third leading cause of burden of disease for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. While Australia’s cancer survival rates are among the best in the world, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people continue to experience a different pattern of cancer incidence and significant disparities in cancer outcomes compared with non-Indigenous Australians.

For Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, health and connection to land, culture, community and identity are intrinsically linked. Health encompasses a whole-of-life view and includes a cyclical concept of life–death–life.

The distinct epidemiology of cancer among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, and unique connection to culture, highlight the need for a specific optimal care pathway for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with cancer. Ensuring this pathway is culturally safe and supportive is vital to tackling the disparities for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

Published in 2018, the Optimal care pathway for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with cancer provides guidance to health practitioners and service planners on optimal care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with cancer across the cancer continuum.

In addition to the key principles underpinning cancer-specific pathways, these are the key concepts that are fundamental to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health:

  • providing a holistic approach to health and wellbeing
  • providing a culturally appropriate and culturally safe service
  • acknowledging the diversity of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples
  • understanding the social determinants and cultural determinants of health (Cancer Australia 2015).

To view the Optimal care pathway for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with cancer, visit the Cancer Australia website. To view the consumer resources – Checking for cancer and Cancer, visit the Cancer Australia website.

For people from culturally diverse backgrounds in Australia, a cancer diagnosis can come with additional complexities, particularly when English proficiency is poor. In many languages there is not a direct translation of the word ‘cancer’, which can make communicating vital information difficult. Perceptions of cancer and related issues can differ greatly in people from culturally diverse backgrounds and this can affect their understanding and decision making after a cancer diagnosis. In addition to different cultural beliefs, when English language is limited there is potential for miscommunication of important information and advice, which can lead to increased stress and anxiety for patients.

A professionally trained interpreter (not a family member or friend) should be made available when communicating with people with limited English proficiency. Navigation of the Australian healthcare system can pose problems for those with a non-Anglo culture, and members of the treatment teams should pay particular attention to supporting these patients.

The Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre has developed a glossary of more than 700 cancer terms in nine different languages. The multilingual glossary has been designed as a resource for professional translators, interpreters and bilingual health professionals working in the cancer field. The glossary is a unique tool that enables language professionals with access to accurate, consistent and culturally appropriate terminology.

Visit the Peter Mac website to see the glossary.

Disability, which can be physical, intellectual or psychological, may have existed before the cancer diagnosis or may be new in onset (occurring due to the cancer treatment or incidentally). Adjusting to life with a disability adds another challenge to cancer care and survivorship.

Several barriers prevent people with disabilities from accessing timely and effective health care (AIHW 2017):

  • physical limitations
  • competing health needs
  • the trauma of undergoing invasive procedures
  • potential barriers associated with obtaining informed consent
  • failure to provide assistance with communication
  • lack of information
  • discriminatory attitudes among healthcare staff.

In caring for people with disabilities and a cancer diagnosis, the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare disability flag should be used at the point of admittance to correctly identify and meet the additional requirements of a person with disability. Facilities should actively consider access requirements, and health practitioners should make reasonable adjustments where required.

Patients aged between seven and 65 years who have a permanent or significant disability may be eligible for support or funding through the National Disability Insurance Scheme (National Disability Insurance Agency 2018). More information can be found on the NDIS website.

Patients aged 65 years or older (50 years or older for Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander people) may be eligible for subsidised support and services through aged care services. An application to determine eligibility can be completed online over the phone. More information can be found at the http://www.myagedcare.gov.au.

More information

‘Talking End of Life’ is a resource that shows how to teach people with intellectual disability about end of life. It is designed for disability support workers but is also helpful for others including families, health professionals and educators.

To view the resource, visit the Talking End of Life website.

Planning and delivering appropriate cancer care for older people can present a number of challenges. This could also be true for frail people or those experiencing comorbidities. Effective communication between oncology and geriatrics departments will help facilitate best practice care, which takes into account physiological age, complex comorbidities, risk of adverse events and drug interactions, as well as the implications of cognitive impairment on suitability of treatment and consent (Steer et al. 2009).

At a national interdisciplinary workshop convened by the Clinical Oncology Society of Australia, it was recommended that people over the age of 70 undergo some form of geriatric assessment, in line with international guidelines (COSA 2013; palliAGED 2018). Screening tools can be used to identify those patients in need of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (Decoster et al. 2015). This assessment can be used to help determine life expectancy and treatment tolerance and guide appropriate referral for multidisciplinary intervention that may improve outcomes (Wildiers et al. 2014).

Frailty is not captured through traditional measures of performance status (e.g. ECOG) and includes assessment in the domains of:

  • function
  • comorbidity
  • presence of geriatric syndromes
  • nutrition
  • polypharmacy
  • cognition
  • emotional status
  • social supports.

While there is no accepted definition of ‘young’ regarding breast cancer, younger women have been defined in previous guidelines as women aged 40 or younger at breast cancer diagnosis (Poggio et al. 2018). In 2020, it was estimated that 23 per cent of all new cancer cases diagnosed for Australian women aged 20–39 were for breast cancer (Cancer Australia 2020f). Younger women with breast cancer are likely to face different challenges including:

  • early menopause
  • fertility and sexuality issues
  • role functions including partnering, caring for young children, education and carer issues
  • self-image.

Compared with older women, these concerns may contribute to higher levels of psychological distress following diagnosis.

Pregnancy-associated breast cancer, defined as breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy or in the year after a pregnancy, accounts for 7 per cent of breast cancers in young women (Ives 2009), which is around 100 women annually in Australia. These women typically have a higher disease stage and more aggressive tumour features at diagnosis. However, when matched by age and disease stage with other breast cancer cases, there appears to be no survival difference, except in women diagnosed in the postpartum period, who have higher mortality and increased distant recurrence even after accounting for these factors.

There is an increased incidence of pre-term delivery for this group and management by a multidisciplinary team experienced in caring for these patients is recommended, with consideration given to the optimal time and type of delivery.

A multidisciplinary team approach is essential in managing this group. Initial investigation of any breast symptom in a pregnant or lactating woman should be the same as any other woman, to avoid diagnostic delays. The treating team should include health professionals involved in the treatment of breast cancer, the care of pregnancy and psychosocial support. The recommended obstetric and cancer management of a woman presenting with gestational breast cancer will depend on the fetal gestation and disease status at diagnosis.

In 2020, the estimated number of men diagnosed with breast cancer in Australia is 167 (Cancer Australia 2019d). While breast cancer is uncommon in males, it is important for men who find changes in their breasts to see their doctor without delay. Given the low number of diagnoses and the identification of breast cancer in the general community as a ‘female disease’, many men who are diagnosed with breast cancer can feel isolated and unsupported. This has the potential to cause significant psychological distress and may lead to anxiety and depression. Those working in the area should be alert to the increased risk for psychological complications, the impact on body image and the potential for isolation. Peer support may be useful to normalise the feeling and side effects of treatment. All resources should be cognisant of not excluding men because this has the potential to further ostracise an already isolated group.

Breast Cancer Network Australia’s ‘My Journey online tool’ has information specifically designed for men. Early referral for breast cancer will assist with some of the stigma associated with breast cancer in men and ensure men can connect with others after diagnosis.

In general, people from lower socioeconomic groups are at greater risk of poor health, have higher rates of illness, disability and death, and live shorter lives than those from higher socioeconomic groups (AIHW 2016). People experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage are less likely to participate in screening programs, more likely to be obese, less likely to exercise and much more likely to smoke, which are all risk factors for cancer. In 2010–2014 age-standardised cancer incidence rates were higher in the lowest socioeconomic areas compared with the highest socioeconomic areas for all cancers combined (Cancer Australia 2019b).

Socioeconomic status and low health literacy are closely correlated. Therefore, effective communication with patients and carers is particularly important given the prevalence of low health literacy in Australia (estimated at 60 per cent of Australian adults) (ACSQHC 2014).

Consideration should be taken for cancer patients experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage to reduce their risk of being underserved for health care.

A diagnosis of cancer may present additional challenges to people who have pre-existing chronic mental health or psychiatric concerns, resulting in exacerbation of their mental health symptoms. This may include heightened anxiety, worsening depression or thoughts of self-harm.

As poor adjustment and coping can affect treatment decisions, people who are known to have a mental health diagnosis need psychosocial assessment in the oncology setting to formulate a plan for ongoing support throughout treatment.

Psychosocial support can assist with challenges in communicating with health professionals, enhance understanding of the treatment journey, ensure capacity for consent to treatment options and improve compliance with treatment requests. A referral for psychosocial support from a health professional to the psycho-oncology team can ensure these patients are provided with targeted interventions or referrals to community-based services that may mitigate problems associated with the impacts of social isolation that frequently accompany chronic mental ill-health.

Many patients with chronic mental health problems may be well known to external service providers. Psycho-oncology health professionals can form meaningful partnerships with existing service providers to optimise patient care throughout treatment and beyond.

Drug use disorders fall within the area of mental health conditions. People who are opiate dependent may have specific and individual requirements regarding pain management and their own preference for type of opiate prescribed or used.

People who identify as sexually or gender diverse may have unique needs following a cancer diagnosis. Sexually or gender diverse identities include (but are not limited to) people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender, collectively ‘LGBT’. There is no universally agreed upon initialism to describe this community, with other terms such as queer/questioning (Q), intersex (I), asexual (A) and pansexual (P) often included, as well as a plus symbol (+) indicating inclusivity of other identities not explicitly mentioned.

Sexual orientation and gender identity are relevant across the entire spectrum of cancer care, from prevention to survivorship and end-of-life care. LGBT people are less likely to participate in cancer screening, and some segments of the LGBT community exhibit elevated rates of specific cancer risk factors – for example, higher rates of smoking and alcohol use. Regarding treatment, there may be unique factors relevant to LGBT people that may affect decision making. Additionally, the LGBT population experiences higher rates of anxiety, depression and stressful life circumstances, and may be at risk of inferior psychosocial outcomes following a cancer diagnosis. LGBT people are also more likely to be estranged from their families of origin, and for older people, less likely to have adult children who may provide support and care.

Barriers to care for LGBT people include past negative interactions with healthcare systems, experiences or fear of discrimination and harassment in healthcare settings, assumptions of cisgender/heterosexual identity, lack of recognition or exclusion of same-sex partners from care, and a lack of relevant supportive care and information resources.

To provide safe and appropriate care for LGBT people with cancer, healthcare providers should:

  • display environmental cues to show an inclusive and safe setting for LGBT patients
  • avoid assumptions about the sexual orientation or gender identity of patients and their partners
  • facilitate positive disclosure of sexual orientation or gender identity
  • include same-sex/gender partners and families of choice in care
  • be aware of relevant supportive care and information resources
  • provide non-judgemental, patient-centred care.

Supportive care in cancer refers to the following five domains:

  • the physical domain, which includes a wide range of physical symptoms that may be acute, relatively short lived or ongoing, requiring continuing interventions or rehabilitation
  • the psychological domain, which includes a range of issues related to the patient’s mental health wellbeing and personal relationships
  • the social domain, which includes a range of social and practical issues that will affect the patient, carer and family such as the need for emotional support, maintaining social networks and financial concerns
  • the information domain, which includes access to information about cancer and its treatment, recovery and survivorship support services and the health system overall
  • the spiritual domain, which focuses on the patient’s changing sense of self and challenges to their underlying beliefs and existential concerns (Palliative Care Victoria 2019).

Fitch’s (2000) model of supportive care recognises the variety and level of intervention required at each critical point as well as the need to be specific to the individual patient. The model targets the type and level of intervention required to meet patients’ supportive care needs.

Fitch’s tiered approach to supportive care

Consider a referral to a psychologist, psychiatrist, pastoral/spiritual care practitioner, social worker, specialist nurse or a relevant community-based program if the patient has these issues:

  • displaying emotional cues such as tearfulness, distress that requires specialist intervention, avoidance or withdrawal
  • being preoccupied with or dwelling on thoughts about cancer and death
  • displaying fears about the treatment process or the changed goals of their treatment
  • displaying excessive fears about cancer progression or recurrence
  • worrying about loss associated with their daily function, dependence on others and loss of dignity
  • becoming isolated from family and friends and withdrawing from company and activities that they previously enjoyed
  • feeling hopeless and helpless about the effect that cancer is having on their life and the disruption to their life plans
  • struggling to communicate with family and loved ones about the implications of their cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • experiencing changes in sexual intimacy, libido and function
  • struggling with the diagnosis of metastatic or advanced disease
  • having difficulties quitting smoking (refer to Quitline on 13 7848) or with other drug and alcohol use
  • having difficulties transitioning to palliative care.

Additional considerations that may arise for the multidisciplinary team include:

  • support for the carer – encourage referrals to psychosocial support from a social worker, psychologist or general practitioner
  • referral to an exercise physiologist or physiotherapist as a therapeutic approach to prevent and manage psychological health
  • referral to wellness-after-cancer programs to provide support, information and offer strategies.

Complementary therapies may be used together with conventional medical treatments to support and enhance quality of life and wellbeing. They do not aim to cure the patient’s cancer. Instead, they are used to help control symptoms such as pain and fatigue (Cancer Council Australia 2019).

The lead clinician or health professional involved in the patient’s care should discuss the patient’s use (or intended use) of complementary therapies not prescribed by the multidisciplinary team to assess safety and efficacy and to identify any potential toxicity or drug interactions.

The lead clinician should seek a comprehensive list of all complementary and alternative medicines being taken and explore the patient’s reason for using these therapies and the evidence base. A transparent and honest discussion that is free from judgement should be encouraged.

While some complementary therapies are supported by strong evidence, others are not. For such therapies, the lead clinician should discuss their potential benefits and use them alongside conventional therapies (NHMRC 2014).

If the patient expresses an interest in using complementary therapies, the lead clinician should consider referring patients to health providers within the multidisciplinary team who have expertise in the field of complementary and alternative therapies (e.g. a clinical pharmacist, dietitian or psychologist) to assist them to reach an informed decision. Costs of such approaches should be part of the discussion with the patient and considered in the context of evidence of benefit.

The lead clinician should assure patients who use complementary therapies that they can still access a multidisciplinary team review and encourage full disclosure about therapies being used.

More information

Advance Care Planning Australia

Advance Care Planning Australia provides national advance care planning resources for individuals, families, health professional and service providers. Resources include a national advisory service, information resources, a legal forms hub and education modules.

Australasian Lymphology Association

The Australasian Lymphology Association has a number of key resources to assist people in gaining an understanding of lymphoedema and the treatments available for the condition.

Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre

The Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre has developed information resources and events to help people move from initial treatment to post treatment and beyond, including those receiving maintenance treatments. While they do not provide clinical advice, they connect with a range of providers to enable improved care.

  • Telephone: (03) 8559 6220
  • Website

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care

The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care has developed a resource for patients and carers explaining the coordination of care that patients should receive from their health service during cancer treatment. The resource is called What to expect when receiving medication for cancer care.

Beyond Blue

Beyond Blue provides information about depression, anxiety and related disorders, as well as about available treatment and support services.

Breast Cancer Network Australia

Breast Cancer Network Australia is a consumer organisation providing specific information on breast cancer.

Cancer Australia

Cancer Australia provides information for consumers, carers and their families including printed resources and video content.

Cancer Council’s Cancer Information and Support Service

Cancer Council 13 11 20 is a confidential telephone support service available to anyone affected by cancer. This service acts as a gateway to evidence-based documented, practical and emotional support available through Cancer Council services and other community organisations. Calls will be answered by a nurse or other oncology professional who can provide information relevant to a patient’s or carer’s situation. Health professionals can also access this service.

  • Telephone: 13 11 20 – Monday to Friday, 9.00am to 5.00pm (some states have extended hours)
  • Website

Cancer Council’s Cancer Connect

Cancer Connect is a free and confidential telephone peer support service that connects someone who has cancer with a specially trained volunteer who has had a similar cancer experience.

A Connect volunteer can listen with understanding and share their experiences and ways of coping. They can provide practical information, emotional support and hope. Many people newly diagnosed with cancer find this one-to-one support very beneficial.

For more information on Cancer Connect call Cancer Council on 13 11 20.

Canteen

Canteen helps adolescents, young adults and parents to cope with cancer in their family. Canteen offers individual support services, peer support services and a youth cancer service, as well as books, resources and useful links.

  • Telephone: 1800 835 932 to talk to a health professional about information and support for young people or 1800 226 833 for other enquiries
  • Website

Clinical trial information

For a collection of clinical trials available in Australia see the following sources of information:

CanEAT pathway

A guide to optimal cancer nutrition for people with cancer, carers and health professionals.

Guides to best cancer care

The short guides help patients, carers and families understand the optimal cancer care that should be provided at each step. They include optimal timeframes within which tests or procedures should be completed, prompt lists to support patients to understand what might happen at each step of their cancer journey and to consider what questions to ask, and provide information to help patients and carers communicate with health professionals.

The guides are located on an interactive web portal, with downloadable PDFs available in multiple languages.

Look Good, Feel Better

A free national community service program, run by the Cancer Patients Foundation, dedicated to teaching cancer patients how to manage the appearance-related side effects caused by treatment for any type of cancer.

McGrath Foundation

The McGrath Foundation employs breast care nurses who help individuals and their families experiencing breast cancer by providing physical, psychological and emotional support.

  • Telephone: (02) 8962 6100
  • Website

Quitline

Quitline is a confidential, evidence-based telephone counselling service. Highly trained Quitline counsellors use behaviour change techniques and motivational interviewing over multiple calls to help people plan, make and sustain a quit attempt.

Quitline is a culturally inclusive service for all, and Aboriginal counsellors are also available. Health professionals can refer patients to Quitline online or via fax.

  • Telephone: 13 7848
  • Website or the relevant website in your state or territory.

Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre

The Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre provides expertise in survivorship care, information, support and education. Its purpose is to support and enable optimal survivorship care.

  • Telephone: (03) 8559 6220
  • Website

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care

The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care has developed a guide for clinicians containing evidence-based strategies to support clinicians to understand and fulfil their responsibilities to cancer patients. This guide is particularly relevant to steps 3 to 6 of the optimal care pathway. The guide is titled NSQHS Standards user guide for medication management in cancer care for clinicians.

Cancer Australia

Information for health providers including guidelines, cancer learnings, cancer guides, reports, resources, videos, posters and pamphlets.

Cancer Council Australia

Information on prevention, research, treatment and support provided by Australia’s peak independent cancer authority.

CanEAT pathway

A guide to optimal cancer nutrition for people with cancer, carers and health professionals.

CounterPart

Peer support for women living with breast or gynaecological cancer. This support service offers high-quality evidence-based educational resources and a drop-in centre.

eviQ

A clinical information resource providing health professionals with current evidence-based, peer-maintained, best practice cancer treatment protocols and information relevant to the Australian clinical environment.

National Health and Medical Research Council

Information on clinical practice guidelines, cancer prevention and treatment.

Advance care directive – voluntary person-led document that focus on an individual’s values and preferences for future health and medical treatment decisions, preferred outcomes and care. They are completed and signed by a competent person. They are recognised by specific legislation (statutory) or common law (non-statutory). Advance care directives can also appoint the substitute decision-maker(s) who can make decisions about health or personal care on the individual’s behalf if they are no longer able to make decisions themselves. Advance care directives focus on the future health care of a person, not on the management of his or her assets. They come into effect when an individual loses decision-making capacity.

Advance care planning – the process of planning for future health and personal care, where the person’s values, beliefs and preferences are made known so they can guide decision making at a future time when that person cannot make or communicate their decisions.

Alternative therapies – treatments used in place of conventional medical treatment.

Care coordinator – the health provider nominated by the multidisciplinary team to coordinate patient care. The care coordinator may change over time depending on the patient’s stage in the care pathway and the location and care in which care is being delivered.

Castrate resistant progressive disease – progressive disease despite castrate levels of testosterone (Cancer Council Australia Advanced Prostate Cancer Guidelines Working Party 2010).

Complementary therapies – supportive treatment used in conjunction with conventional medical treatment. These treatments may improve wellbeing and quality of life and help people deal with the side effects of cancer.

End-of-life care – includes physical, spiritual and psychosocial assessment, and care and treatment, delivered by health professionals and ancillary staff. It also includes support of families and carers and care of the patient’s body after their death.

Immunotherapy – a type of cancer treatment that helps the body’s immune system to fight cancer. Immunotherapy can boost the immune system to work better against cancer or remove barriers to the immune system attacking the cancer.

Indicator – a documentable or measurable piece of information regarding a recommendation in the optimal care pathway.

Informed financial consent – the provision of cost information to patients, including notification of likely out-of-pocket expenses (gaps), by all relevant service providers, preferably in writing, before admission to hospital or treatment (Commonwealth Department of Health 2017).

Lead clinician – the clinician who is nominated as being responsible for individual patient care. The lead clinician may change over time depending on the stage of the care pathway and where care is being provided.

Metastatic disease – cancer that has spread from the part of the body where it started (the primary site) to other parts of the body.

Multidisciplinary care – an integrated team approach to health care in which medical and allied health providers consider all relevant treatment options and collaboratively develop an individual treatment plan for each patient.

Multidisciplinary team – comprises the core disciplines that are integral to providing good care. The team is flexible in approach, reflects the patient’s clinical and psychosocial needs and has processes to facilitate good communication.

Multidisciplinary team meeting – a meeting of health professionals from one or more clinical disciplines who together make decisions about recommended treatment of patients.

Optimal care pathway – the key principles and practices required at each stage of the care pathway to guide the delivery of consistent, safe, high-quality and evidence-based care for all people affected by cancer.

Palliative care – any form of medical care or treatment that concentrates on reducing the severity of disease symptoms.

Patient management frameworks – tumour stream models adopted in Victoria in 2003 to reduce variation in cancer care. The optimal care pathways are updated versions of these models.

Performance status – an objective measure of how well a patient can carry out activities of daily life.

Prehabilitation – one or more interventions performed in a newly diagnosed cancer patient that are designed to improve physical and mental health outcomes as the patient undergoes treatment and beyond.

Primary care health professional – in most cases this is a general practitioner but may also include general practice nurses, community nurses, nurse practitioners, allied health professionals, midwives, pharmacists, dentists and Aboriginal health workers.

Primary specialist – the person who makes the referral to the multidisciplinary team (such as specialist physician, surgeon, oncologist, palliative care specialist). This person will also make referrals for treatment and will be responsible for overseeing follow-up care.

PSMA PET/CT – a whole body scan that images prostate cancer wherever it is located in the body.

Rehabilitation – comprises multidisciplinary efforts to allow the patient to achieve optimal physical, social, physiological and vocational functioning within the limits imposed by the disease and its treatment.

Spiritual care – the aspect of humanity that refers to the way individuals seek and express meaning and purpose and the way they experience their connectedness to the moment, to self, to others, to nature, and to the significant or sacred.

Substitute decision-maker – a person permitted under the law to make decisions on behalf of someone who does not have competence or capacity.

Supportive care – care and support that aims to improve the quality of life of people living with cancer, cancer survivors and their family and carers and particular forms of care that supplement clinical treatment modalities.

Survivorship – an individual is considered a cancer survivor from the time of diagnosis, and throughout their life; the term includes individuals receiving initial or maintenance treatment, in recovery or in the post-treatment phase.

Survivorship care plan – a formal, written document that provides details of a person’s cancer diagnosis and treatment, potential late and long-term effects arising from the cancer and its treatment, recommended follow-up, surveillance, and strategies to remain well.

Targeted therapy – a medicine that blocks the growth and spread of cancer by interfering with specific molecules.

We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of Country throughout Australia and their continuing connection to the land, sea and community. We pay our respects to them and their cultures and to Elders past, present and emerging.

This work is available from the Cancer Council website.

First published in September 2015. This edition published in June 2021.

ISBN: 978-1-76096-149-7

Cancer Council Victoria and Department of Health Victoria 2021 Optimal care pathway for people with breast cancer, 2nd edn, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne.

Enquiries about this publication can be sent to optimalcare.pathways@cancervic.org.au.

Our thanks to the following health professionals, consumer representatives, stakeholders and organisations consulted in developing this optimal care pathway.

Professor Christobel Saunders (Chair), Surgeon, Royal Perth Hospital, Fiona Stanley Hospital, St John of God Subiaco Hospital; Professor Surgical Oncology, The University of Western Australia; Chair, PathWest Laboratory Medicine

Professor Fran Boyle, Medical Oncologist, Mater Hospital

Dr Adrian Dabscheck, Palliative Care Physician, Western Health

Dr Bianca Devitt, Medical Oncologist, Eastern Health

Miss Gillian Farrell, Plastic Surgeon, Cabrini Health

Professor Gelareh Farshid, Senior Consultant Pathologist; SA Pathology, Royal Adelaide Hospital

Dr Jocelyn Lippey, Surgeon, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne and Northern Hospital

Professor Bruce Mann, Surgeon, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The Royal Women’s Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

Professor Kelly-Anne Phillips, Medical Oncologist, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

Ms Kirsten Pilatti, Chief Executive Officer, Breast Cancer Network Australia

Ms Lisa Sheeran, Breast Care Nurse Consultant, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

Ms Danielle Spence, Head of Division, Strategy and Support, Cancer Council Victoria

Professor Robert Thomas, Special Advisor on Health, Professorial Fellow, The University of Melbourne

Dr Alison Trainer, Clinical Geneticist, Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital

Dr Yvonne Zissiadis, Radiation Oncologist, Genesis Care

Ms Julia Brancato, Project Coordinator, Optimal Care Pathways, Cancer Council Victoria

Professor Christobel Saunders, Surgeon (Chair), Royal Perth Hospital, Fiona Stanley Hospital, The University of Western Australia

Associate Professor Boon Chua, Radiation Oncologist, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

Associate Professor Jacquie Chirgwin, Medical Oncologist, Box Hill Hospital; Director, ANZ Breast Cancer Trials Group

Ms Linda Cicciarelli, Genetic Counsellor, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

Dr Adrian Dabscheck, Palliative Care Physician, Western Health

Miss Gillian Farrell, Plastic Surgeon, Cabrini Health

Associate Professor Gelareh Farshid, Pathologist; Clinical Director, BreastScreen SA

Ms Jane Fletcher, Health Psychologist, Cabrini Health; Director, Melbourne Psycho-oncology Service

Ms Coral Keren, consumer representative

Professor Bruce Mann, Surgeon, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The Royal Women’s Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

Ms Sarah Pratt, Breast Care Nurse, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

Professor Kelly-Anne Phillips, Medical Oncologist, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

Professor Gary Richardson, Medical Oncologist, Cabrini Health

Dr Liu-Ming Schmidt, Surgeon, Albury Surgical Group

Ms Wanda Stelmach, General and Breast Surgeon; Clinical Program Director, Surgery, Northern Health

Dr Karen Taylor, Senior Specialist Radiation Oncologist, William Buckland Radiotherapy Centre, The Alfred, Cabrini Health

Mr Peter Thomas, General and Breast Surgeon, Wangaratta

Dr John Waugh, Radiologist, Director of Training, Monash BreastScreen

Professor Robert Thomas, Chief Advisor on Cancer, Department of Health and Human Services, Victoria

Advance Care Planning Australia

Allied Health Professions Australia

Australasian Association of Nuclear Medicine Specialists

Australasian Chapter of Palliative Medicine, Royal Australia College of Physicians

Australasian Lymphology Association

Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology

Australian and New Zealand Society of Palliative Care

Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre

Australian College of Nursing

Australian Medical Association

Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy

Breast Cancer Network Australia

Breast Screen Victoria

Cancer Nurses Society of Australia

Clinical Oncology Society of Australia

Counterpart

Interventional Radiology Society of Australasia

Medical Oncology Group of Australia

McGrath Foundation

National Breast Cancer Foundation

Oncology Social Workers Australia and New Zealand

Royal Australasian College of Physicians

Royal Australasian College of Surgeons

Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists

Royal Australian College of General Practitioners

Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia

Alfred Health

Cancer Australia

Cancer Council Victoria, Strategy and Support Division

Cancer Institute New South Wales

Concord Repatriation General Hospital New South Wales

Consumer representative

Department of Health Victoria, Commissioning and System Improvement Division, Cancer Unit

National Cancer Expert Reference Group

Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre

St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne

Other stakeholders consulted to provide feedback include relevant Cancer Council committees and networks, Integrated Cancer Services, Primary Health Networks and several health services.

The multidisciplinary team should include the following members:

  • breast surgeon
  • medical oncologist
  • nurse(s) (with appropriate expertise such as a breast care nurse)
  • pathologist
  • radiation oncologist
  • radiologist.

The multidisciplinary team may include the following members:

  • Aboriginal health practitioner, Indigenous liaison officer or remote general practitioner
  • care coordinator
  • clinical trial nurse/coordinator
  • dietitian
  • exercise physiologist
  • fertility specialist
  • general practitioner
  • geneticist and/or genetic counsellor
  • lymphoedema physiotherapist/specialist
  • occupational therapist
  • pain specialist
  • palliative care specialist
  • pharmacist
  • physiotherapist
  • plastic surgeon
  • psychologist
  • psychiatrist
  • reconstructive surgeon
  • social worker
  • spiritual/pastoral care.

Australian Adult Cancer Pain Management Guideline Working Party 2019, Australian adult cancer pain management guideline: ‘Cancer pain management in adults’, Cancer Council Australia, Sydney, viewed 6 June 2019, https://wiki.cancer.org.au/australiawiki/index.php?oldid=191646.

Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre 2016, ‘Survivorship care planning’, viewed 2 October 2020, https://www.petermac.org/sites/default/files/page/downloads/Survivorship_Care_Planning.pdf.

Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre 2019, Community support organisations’ cancer survivorship care consensus statement, viewed 10 February 2020, https://www.petermac.org/sites/default/files/media-uploads/NGO_ConsensusStatement.pdf.

Australian Clinical Trials 2015, ‘Potential benefits and risks’, National Health and Medical Research Council, Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Australian Government, Canberra, viewed 24 July 2019, https://www.australianclinicaltrials.gov.au/why-be-part-clinical-trial/potential-benefits-and-potential-risks.

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) 2014, Health literacy: taking action to improve safety and quality, ACSQHC, Sydney, viewed 18 February 2020, https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/Health-Literacy-Taking-action-to-improve-safety-and-quality.pdf.

Australian Commission for Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) 2015, Credentialing health practitioners and defining their scope of clinical practice: a guide for managers and practitioners, ACSQHC, Sydney, viewed 18 February 2020, https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/publications-and-resources/resource-library/credentialing-health-practitioners-and-defining-their-scope-clinical-practice-guide-managers-and-practitioners.

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) 2017, National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards guide for hospitals, ACSQHC, Sydney, viewed 18 February 2020, https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/National-Safety-and-Quality-Health-Service-Standards-Guide-for-Hospitals.pdf.

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) 2019a, Person-centred care, ACSQHC, Sydney, viewed 15 May 2020, https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/partnering-consumers/person-centred-care.

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) 2019b, Australian Hospital Patient Experience Question Set, ACSQHC, Sydney, viewed 25 March 2020, https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/indicators-measurement-and-reporting/australian-hospital-patient-experience-question-set.

Australian Commission for Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) 2020, ‘NSQHS Standards user guide for medication management in cancer care’, ACSQHC, Sydney, viewed 16 April 2020, https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/publications-and-resources/resource-library/nsqhs-standards-user-guide-medication-management-cancer-care.

Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council (AHMAC) 2011, A national framework for advance care directives, Council of Australian Governments Health Council, Adelaide, viewed 22 July 2019, http://www.coaghealthcouncil.gov.au/Portals/0/A%20National%20Framework%20for%20Advance%20Care%20Directives_September%202011.pdf.

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) 2016, Australia’s health 2016, Australia’s health series no. 15. Cat. no. AUS 199, AIHW, Canberra.

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) 2017, Access to health services by Australians with disability, viewed 20 February 2020, https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/disability/access-health-services-disability/contents/content.

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) 2018a, Australia’s health 2018, Australia’s health series no. 16. Cat. no. AUS 221, AIHW, Canberra.

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) 2018b, Screening reduces the risk of death from breast, cervical and bowel cancer, Australia’s health series no. 16. Cat. no. AUS 221, AIHW, Canberra.

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) 2019, Cancer in Australia 2019, Cancer series no. 119 (vol. CAN 123) AIHW, Canberra.

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) & European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2006, ‘ASCO-ESMO Consensus Statement on Quality Cancer Care’, Journal of Medical Oncology, vol. 24, no. 21. pp. 3498–3499.

AYA Cancer Fertility Preservation Guidance Working Group 2014, Fertility preservation for AYAs diagnosed with cancer: guidance for health professionals, Cancer Council Australia, Sydney, viewed 20 July 2020, https://wiki.cancer.org.au/australia/COSA:AYA_cancer_fertility_preservation/Introduction.

Baade P, Meng X, Sinclair C, Youl P 2012, ‘Estimating the future burden of cancers preventable by better diet and physical activity in Australia’, Medical Journal of Australia, vol. 196, no. 5 , pp. 337–340.

Blaes AH, Konety SH 2020, ‘Cardiovascular disease in breast cancer survivors: an important topic in breast cancer survivorship’, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaa097.

Brown WJ, Bauman AE, Bull FC, Burton NW 2012, Development of evidence-based physical activity recommendations for adults (18–64 years). Report prepared for the Australian Government Department of Health, August 2012.

Cancer Australia 2010, Advice about familial aspects of breast cancer and epithelial ovarian cancer, viewed 25 November 2020, http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/breast/risk-reducing-surgery-fact-sheet.

Cancer Australia 2012, Report to the nation – breast cancer, Cancer Australia, Surry Hills, NSW.

Cancer Australia 2014, Overdiagnosis from mammographic screening: position statement, viewed 27 November 2019, https://canceraustralia.gov.au/publications-and-resources/position-statements/overdiagnosis-mammographic-screening.

Cancer Australia 2015a Position statement: Early detection of breast cancer, viewed 10 November 2020, https://www.canceraustralia.gov.au/publications-and-resources/position-statements/early-detection-breast-cancer.

Cancer Australia 2015b, National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cancer framework, Cancer Australia, Surry Hills, viewed 24 August 2017, https://www.canceraustralia.gov.au/publications-and-resources/cancer-australia-publications/national-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-cancer-framework.

Cancer Australia 2016, Understanding breast cancer in men, viewed 27 November 2019, https://canceraustralia.gov.au/publications-and-resources/cancer-australia-publications/understanding-breast-cancer-men.

Cancer Australia 2017a, The investigation of a new breast symptom: a guide for general practitioners, viewed 27 November 2019, https://canceraustralia.gov.au/publications-and-resources/cancer-australia-publications/investigation-new-breast-symptom-guide-general-practitioners.

Cancer Australia 2017b, Principles of cancer survivorship, Australian Government, Sydney, viewed 18 February 2020, https://canceraustralia.gov.au/sites/default/files/publications/principles-cancer-survivorship/pdf/pocs_-_principles_of_cancer_survivorship.pdf.

Cancer Australia 2018, Risk factors for breast cancer: a review of the evidence, viewed 27 November 2019, https://canceraustralia.gov.au/sites/default/files/publications/risk-factors-breast-cancer-review-evidence-2018/pdf/rfbcr_risk_factors_for_breast_cancer_a_review_of_the_evidence_2018_report.pdf.

Cancer Australia 2019a, Principles of multidisciplinary care, Australian Government, Sydney, viewed 18 July 2019, https://canceraustralia.gov.au/system/tdf/guidelines/all_about_multidisciplinary_care.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=3551.

Cancer Australia 2019b, ‘Cancer incidence’, viewed 18 February 2020, https://ncci.canceraustralia.gov.au/diagnosis/cancer-incidence/cancer-incidence.

Cancer Australia 2019c, Shared follow-up care for early breast cancer: summary of evidence, Australian Government, Sydney, viewed 2 September 2020, https://www.canceraustralia.gov.au/publications-and-resources/cancer-australia-publications/shared-follow-care-early-breast-cancer-summary-evidence.

Cancer Australia 2019d, ‘Breast cancer in Australia statistics’, Australian Government, Sydney, viewed 11 November 2020, https://www.canceraustralia.gov.au/affected-cancer/cancer-types/breast-cancer/breast-cancer-australia-statistics.

Cancer Australia 2020a, Cancer care in the time of COVID-19: a conceptual framework for the management of cancer during a pandemic, Australian Government, Sydney, viewed 3 September 2020, https://www.canceraustralia.gov.au/publications-and-resources/cancer-australia-publications/cancer-care-time-covid-19-conceptual-framework-management-cancer-during-pandemic.

Cancer Australia 2020b ‘Breast cancer: symptoms’, Australian Government, Sydney, viewed 25 August 2020, https://www.canceraustralia.gov.au/affected-cancer/cancer-types/breast-cancer/symptoms.

Cancer Australia 2020c, Position statement on the use of fine needle aspiration and core biopsy of the breast in the BreastScreen Australia program, Australian Government, Sydney, viewed 18 June 2020, https://canceraustralia.gov.au/system/tdf/position-statements/position_statement_on_the_use_of_fine_needle_aspiration_and_core_biopsy_of_the_breast_in_the_breastscreen_australia_program.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=11841.

Cancer Australia 2020d, Roles and responsibilities of the shared follow-up and survivorship care team, Australian Government, Sydney, viewed 25 August 2020, https://www.canceraustralia.gov.au/publications-and-resources/cancer-australia-publications/roles-and-responsibilities-shared-follow-and-survivorship-care-team.

Cancer Australia 2020e, Guidance for the management of early breast cancer: recommendations and practice points, Australian Government, Sydney, viewed 10 November 2020, https://www.canceraustralia.gov.au/publications-and-resources/cancer-australia-publications/guidance-management-early-breast-cancer-recommendations-and-practice-points.

Cancer Australia 2020f, ‘Breast cancer in young women statistics’, Australian Government, Sydney, viewed 11 November 2020, https://breast-cancer-in-young-women.canceraustralia.gov.au/statistics.

Cancer Council Australia 2015, ‘Breast cancer’, viewed 2 March 2015, http://www.cancer.org.au/about-cancer/types-of-cancer/breast-cancer.html.

Cancer Council Australia 2018, ‘Prevention, Cancer Council Australia, Sydney, viewed 18 July 2019, https://www.cancer.org.au/preventing-cancer/.

Cancer Council Australia 2019, ‘Complementary and alternative therapies’, Cancer Council Australia, Sydney, viewed 22 July 2019, https://www.cancer.org.au/about-cancer/treatment/complementary-therapies-and-cancer.html.

Cancer Council Victoria 2019, ‘Palliative care’, Cancer Council Victoria, viewed 7 October 2019, https://www.cancervic.org.au/cancer-information/treatments/treatments-types/palliative_care/palliative-care-treatment.html.

Cancer Research in Primary Care 2016, Principles statement: Shared care, PC4 Shared Care Working Group, Melbourne, viewed 4 October 2019, http://pc4tg.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/PC4-Principles-Statement-shared-care-2016-1.pdf.

Cardoso F, Senkus E, Costa A, Papadopoulos E, Aapro M 2018, ‘4th ESO–ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 4)’ The European Society for Medical Oncology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1634–1657.

Clinical Oncology Society of Australia (COSA) 2013, Special Issue: COSA’s 40th Annual Scientific Meeting, Cancer Care Coming of Age, 12–14 November 2013, Adelaide Convention Centre, Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 61–98.

Clinical Oncology Society of Australia (COSA) 2015, Cancer care coordinator: position statement, COSA, Sydney, viewed 22 July 2019, https://www.cosa.org.au/media/332296/cancer-care-coordinator-position-statement_final-endorsed-by-council_161115_cnsa-logo.pdf.

Clinical Oncology Society of Australia (COSA) 2016, Australasian tele-trial model: access to clinical trials closer to home using tele-health a national guide for implementation, v1.7, COSA, Sydney, viewed 18 July 2019, https://www.cosa.org.au/media/332325/cosa-teletrial-model-final-19sep16.pdf.

Clinical Oncology Society of Australia (COSA) 2018, COSA position statement on exercise in cancer care, COSA, Sydney, viewed 22 July 2019, https://www.cosa.org.au/media/332488/cosa-position-statement-v4-web-final.pdf.

Commonwealth Department of Health 2017, Out-of-pocket expenses for private medical treatment (informed financial consent), Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.

Cormie P, Atkinson M, Bucci L, Cust A, Eakin E, Hayes S, et al. 2018, ‘Clinical Oncology Society of Australia position statement on exercise in cancer care’, Medical Journal of Australia, vol. 209, no. 4, pp. 184–187.

Cormie P, Zopf EM, Zhang X, Schmitz KH 2017, ‘The impact of exercise on cancer mortality, recurrence, and treatment-related adverse effects’, Epidemiologic Reviews, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 71–92.

Decoster L, Van Puyvelde K, Mohile S, Wedding U, Basso U, Colloca G, et al. 2015, ‘Screening tools for multidimensional health problems warranting a geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: an update on SIOG recommendations’, Annals of Oncology, vol. 26, no.1, pp. 288–300.

Emery J 2014, ‘Cancer survivorship – the role of the GP’, Australian Family Physician, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 521–525.

eviQ 2019a, Referral guidelines for breast cancer risk assessment and consideration of genetic testing, viewed 27 November 2019, https://www.eviq.org.au/cancer-genetics/adult/referral-guidelines/1620-referral-guidelines-for-breast-cancer-risk-as.

eviQ 2019b, ‘Safe handling and waste management of hazardous drugs’, Cancer Institute NSW, Sydney, viewed 22 July 2019, https://www.eviq.org.au/clinical-resources/administration-of-antineoplastic-drugs/188-safe-handling-and-waste-management-of-hazardou.

Farshid G, Bilous M, Morey A, Fox S, Lakhani S, Loi S, et al. 2019, ‘ASCO/CAP 2018 breast cancer HER2 testing guidelines: summary of pertinent recommendations for practice in Australia’, Pathology, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 345–348.

Fitch M 2000, ‘Supportive care for cancer patients’, Hospital Quarterly, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 39–46.

Fitch MI 2008, ‘Supportive care framework’, Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 6–14.

Gilligan T, Coyle N, Frankel RM, Berry DL, Bohlke K, Epstein, RM, et al. 2017, ‘Patient–clinician communication: American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus guideline’, Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 35, no. 31, pp. 3618–3623.

Hack TF, Reuther DJ, Weir LM, Grenier D, Degner LF 2012, ‘Promoting consultation recording practice in oncology: identification of critical implementation factors and determination of patient benefit’, Psycho-Oncology, vol. 22, pp. 1273–1282.

Haines IE 2011, ‘Managing patients with advanced cancer: the benefits of early referral for palliative care’, Medical Journal of Australia, vol. 194, no. 3, pp. 107–108.

Hayes SC, Newton RU, Spence RR, Galvao DA 2019, ‘The Exercise and Sports Science Australia position statement: exercise medicine in cancer management’, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1175–1199.

Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E 2006, From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition, National Academies Press, Washington.

Ives A 2009, Breast cancer and pregnancy: How does a concurrent or subsequent pregnancy affect breast cancer diagnosis, management and outcomes? School of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Perth.

Jefford M, Ward AC, Lisy K, Lacey K, Emery JD, Glaser AW, et al. 2017, ‘Patient-reported outcomes in cancer survivors: a population-wide cross-sectional study’, Support Care Cancer, no. 10, pp. 3171–3179.

Laidsaar-Powell R, Butow P, Boyle F, Juraskova 2018a, ‘Facilitating collaborative and effective family involvement in the cancer setting: guidelines for clinicians (TRIO guidelines-1)’, Patient Education and Counseling, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 970–982.

Laidsaar-Powell R, Butow P, Boyle F, Juraskova 2018b, ‘Managing challenging interactions with family caregivers in the cancer setting: guidelines for clinicians (TRIO guidelines-2)’, Patient Education and Counselling, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 983–994.

Lisy K, Langdon L, Piper A, Jefford M 2019, ‘Identifying the most prevalent unmet needs of cancer survivors in Australia: a systematic review’, Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. e68–e78.

Monterosso L, Platt V, Bulsara M, Berg M 2019, ‘Systematic review and meta-analysis of patient reported outcomes for nurse-led models of survivorship care for adult cancer patients’, Cancer Treatment Reviews Journal, no. 73, pp. 62–72.

My Health Record 2019, ‘What is My Health Record?’ Australian Government, Sydney, viewed 17 December 2019, https://www.myhealthrecord.gov.au/for-you-your-family/what-is-my-health-record.

National Cancer Institute (NCI) 2015, Surgery to reduce the risk of breast cancer, viewed 25 November 2020, http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/breast/risk-reducing-surgery-fact-sheet.

National Cancer Survivorship Initiative (NCSI) 2015, ‘Stratified pathways of care’, National Health Service, UK, viewed 2 March 2015.

National Disability Insurance Agency 2018, ‘How the NDIS works’, NDIS, Canberra, viewed 3 June 2019, https://www.ndis.gov.au/understanding/how-ndis-works.

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 2013, Personalised medicine and genetics, viewed 3 June 2019, https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/personalised-medicine-and-genetics.

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 2014, Talking with your patients about complementary medicine: a resource for clinicians, NHMRC, Canberra, viewed 18 February 2020, https://www.caresearch.com.au/caresearch/ClinicalPractice/PatientConsiderations/ComplementaryTherapies/tabid/1258/Default.aspx.

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 2020, Australian Guidelines to Reduce Health Risks from Drinking Alcohol, NHMRC, Canberra, viewed 15 April 2021, https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/australian-guidelines-reduce-health-risks-drinking-alcohol#block-views-block-file-attachments-content-block-1.

palliAGED 2018, ‘Needs Assessment’, Flinders University, Bedford Park, viewed 1 October 2019, https://www.palliaged.com.au/tabid/4879/Default.aspx.

Palliative Care Australia 2018, National Palliative Care Standards, 5th edn, Palliative Care Australia, Canberra, viewed 24 July 2019, http://palliativecare.org.au/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2018/11/PalliativeCare-National-Standards-2018_Nov-web.pdf.

Palliative Care Victoria 2019, ‘Spiritual care’, Palliative Care Victoria, Melbourne, viewed 22 July 2019, https://www.pallcarevic.asn.au/healthcare-professionals/about-palliative-care/care/spiritual-care/.

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre 2019, Community support organisations’ cancer survivorship care consensus statement, viewed 10 February 2020, https://www.petermac.org/sites/default/files/media-uploads/NGO_ConsensusStatement.pdf.

Poggio F, Lambertini M, Bighin C, Conte B, Blondeaux E, Alonzo A, et al. 2018, ‘Management of young women with early breast cancer’, ESMO Open, 3(Suppl 1), e000458. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000458.

Queensland Health 2015, Sad news sorry business: guidelines for caring for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people through death and dying, State Government of Queensland, Brisbane, viewed 22 July 2019, https://www.health.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0023/151736/sorry_business.pdf.

Silver JK, Baima J 2013, ‘Cancer prehabilitation: an opportunity to decrease treatment-related morbidity, increase cancer treatment options, and improve physical and psychological health outcomes’, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, vol. 92, no. 8, pp. 715–727.

Silver JK 2015, ‘Cancer prehabilitation and its role in improving health outcomes and reducing health care costs’, Seminars in Oncology Nursing, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 1–3.

Sjoquist K, Zalcberg J 2013, ‘Clinical trials – advancing cancer care’, Cancer Forum, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 80–88.

Steer B, Marx G, Singhal N, McJannett M, Goldstein D, Prowse R 2009, ‘Cancer in older people: a tale of two disciplines’, Internal Medicine Journal, vol. 39, pp. 771–775.

Tan SY, Turner J, Kerin-Ayres K, Butler S, Deguchi C, Khatri S, et al. 2019, ‘Health concerns of cancer survivors after primary anti-cancer treatment’, Support Cancer Care, no. 10, pp. 3739–3747.

Temel J, Greer J, Muzikansky A, Gallagher E, Admane S, Jackson V 2010, ‘Early palliative care for patients with non-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer’, New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 363, no. 8, pp. 733–742.

Vardy JL, Raymond JC, Koczwara B, Lisy K, Cohn RJ, Joske D, et al. 2019, ‘Clinical Oncology Society of Australia position statement on cancer survivorship care’, Australian Journal of General Practice, vol. 48, no.12, pp. 833–836.

Vijayvergia N, Denlinger CS 2015, ‘Lifestyle factors in cancer survivorship: where we are and where we are headed’, Journal of Personalized Medicine, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 243–263.

Walker S, Hyde C, Hamilton W 2014, ‘Risk of breast cancer in symptomatic women in primary care: a case–control study using electronic records’, British Journal of General Practice, vol. 64, no. 629, e788-e793.

Wildiers H, Heeren P, Puts M, Topinkova E, Maryska LG, Janssen-Heijnen MLG, et al. 2014, ‘International Society of Geriatric Oncology Consensus on geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer’, Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 32, no. 24, pp. 2595–2603.

World Health Organization (WHO) 2018, ‘Malnutrition’, WHO, Geneva, viewed 18 July 2019, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/malnutrition.

Zimmermann C, Swami N, Krzyzanowska M, Hannon B, Leighl N, Oza A, et al. 2014, ‘Early palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: a cluster-randomised controlled trial’, Lancet, vol. 383, no. 9930, pp. 1721–1730.